The dictator Kagame at UN

The dictator Kagame at UN
Dictators like Kagame who have changed their national constitutions to remain indefinitely on power should not be involved in UN high level and global activities including chairing UN meetings

Why has the UN ignored its own report about the massacres of Hutu refugees in DRC ?

The UN has ignored its own reports, NGOs and media reports about the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Hutu in DRC Congo (estimated to be more than 400,000) by Kagame when he attacked Hutu refugee camps in Eastern DRC in 1996. This barbaric killings and human rights violations were perpetrated by Kagame’s RPF with the approval of UK and USA and with sympathetic understanding and knowledge of UNHCR and international NGOs which were operating in the refugees camps. According to the UN, NGO and media reports between 1993 and 2003 women and girls were raped. Men slaughtered. Refugees killed with machetes and sticks. The attacks of refugees also prevented humanitarian organisations to help many other refugees and were forced to die from cholera and other diseases. Other refugees who tried to return to Rwanda where killed on their way by RFI and did not reach their homes. No media, no UNHCR, no NGO were there to witness these massacres. When Kagame plans to kill, he makes sure no NGO and no media are prevent. Kagame always kills at night.

27 Dec 2014

[AfricaRealities.com] Re: [AfricaRealities] UK charities such as Africa Relief Trust are exploiting Africa through UK nation-wide fundraising strategies where the money raised is never used for projects in Africa.

 

This is a real shame!!!

 
Didier Ibwilakwingi-Ekom


De : "Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [AfricaRealities]" <AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com>
À : "africarealities@yahoogroups.com" <africarealities@yahoogroups.com>; "amakurunamateka@yahoogroups.com" <amakurunamateka@yahoogroups.com>
Envoyé le : Vendredi 26 décembre 2014 18h58
Objet : [AfricaRealities] UK charities such as Africa Relief Trust are exploiting Africa through UK nation-wide fundraising strategies where the money raised is never used for projects in Africa.

 
UK charities  such as Africa Relief Trust are exploiting  Africa through UK nation-wide fundraising strategies where the money raised is  never used for projects in Africa. There are many  white led UK charity based organisations in the UK that are just using poverty in Africa to raise money at national level and that money never reach Africa at all. But when a UK charity is run by a black person, it  would not manage to fundraise a penny from British people.
 
These charities are run  by white people and even when a  black person  is involved, he/she has no control of the expenditure of the money raised as part of the well-known discrimination and racism practices that  prevail in the UK. In the UK, a charitable organisation runs by a black  person or any other person who is not white  could not raise any funding at all.  Comic Relief is supporting this corruption practice and failed to open an investigation related to Africa Relief Trust which  received £170, 000 as grant , but that money was not used for charitable activities in Africa.  Comic Relief just relies on the paper-based reports submitted by to them by the charity while there is no evidence about the outcomes achieved by Africa Relief Trust in their
work in Africa. While the white British people frequently  criticise African people for corruption, when it is about corruption that  they are involved  themselves in Africa, they governments, funders and institutions support that corruption.

--------------------------------------------------------

Watchdog probes East Lancashire Africa charity

 
A BLACKBURN and Ribble Valley charity, which received £170,000 from Comic Relief, is the subject of a major investigation by the sector's national regulator.
The Charity Commission has opened a 'statutory inquiry' into the Africa Relief Trust (ART).
The probe centres on whether claims made for discounts on businesses rates by the charity for using several empty properties across the UK, including a number in Blackburn with Darwen, are valid.
The commission is concerned that if they are not legally correct, the unpaid cash due could force ART into bankruptcy.
It is also examining whether the four trustees of the charity, the owners of the empty buildings, or anyone else, made a personal profit from the discount claims in contravention of charity law.
ART gives a modest family home at 38, St James's Road in the Blackburn as its address on its website but now operates from a property in Inglewhite Road, Longridge.
The probe is the most serious the regulator can undertake and can lead to police investigations and court action.
The commission undertook 1,528 compliance investigations in 2012/2013 but just 15 resulted in a 'statutory inquiry'.
The probe into ART, which works mainly in Northern Uganda, centres on whether the trustees correctly claimed business rate relief on several premises in Blackburn with Darwen borough and other local authorities in the last two years and whether any liability for payments to those councils might jeopardise its financial viability.
The charity commission said it was examining 'whether the charity trustees have properly discharged their trustee duties when making decisions to enter into tenancy agreements and occupy those properties to further their charitable purposes and whether any benefit to the landlord or other parties is incidental to that.' It said its investigation began as a compliance case in September 2011 but escalated into a statutory inquiry 'as the commission's concerns about the risks to the charity's assets and about the trustees' failure to provide full and complete information mounted' According to the Charity Commission website the trustees are Anthony Thomas Robert Peers, Rachel Carr, Ambassador Joseph Ocwet and Mrs Betty Ocwet.
Mr Peers was initially contacted by the Lancashire Telegraph by email and then rang to reveal ART now operated from Longridge. Mr Ocwet, a fomer Ugandan ambassador to the African Union, did not reply to emails.
The charity was first registered in 1999 and raised £5,573 between July 1 2008 and June 30 2012 and spent £5,291 over the same five-years - the only period returns are publicly available.
The BBC's Comic Relief charity confirmed it gave ART £170,000 between 2001 and 2007.
When the Lancashire Telegraph visited the Blackburn address, which is not one of the properties subject to the rate relief claims and is Mr Peers former home, it had been sold to a new owner and then let by Harris Properties of Whalley Old Road to tenants.
Babar Salim, manager at Harris Properties, said: "We have let this property for three years. We know nothing about the Africa Relief Trust, Mr Peers or Ms Carr but the property has received letters and visits from bailiffs seeking to speak to them."
While the property remains as ART's address on the website, it now operates from Longridge and gives a PO Box in Preston as its contact address Blackburn MP Jack Straw, who received a letter from the commission about the inquiry, said: "This is obviously a matter of concern to me.
"The people of Blackburn are very generous and they need to know that money they give to charities is properly used for the purposes intended."
Ribble Valley MP Nigel Evans said: "The Charity Commission do not embark on this type of inquiry lightly. The trustees of ART need to co-operate fully. The public are very generous in their giving to charities and need to be reassured that their generosity is not being abused."
Mr Peers said that ART had behaved '100 per cent correctly' in regard to business rates relief and was confident it could justify all its rates relief claims.
The 41-year-old former publican who grew up in Revidge, Blackburn, and attended the town's Notre Dame RC High School accused the Charity Commission of poor communication, cancelling meetings and failing to give ART a chance to explain and justify its actions.
Mr Peers said: "The Charity Commission has behaved disgracefully."
He said any visits by bailiffs to the St James's Street, Blackburn property must be on behalf of local councils connected to the business rates relief question.
Mr Peers said: "I got involved in this after a chance meeting in 2010 with Ambassador Ocwet in London. The charity was dormant then. We have revived it and hope to raise between £60,000 and £70,000 this year.
"We originally used my private home in St James's Road as a base but have now moved to Longridge. The bailiffs must have come from some of the local authorities who saw the address on the website. I will have to change it."
ART was set up to assist people in social distress in Africa, more specifically to support those in the conflict areas of Northern Uganda.
According to its website: "The project put smiles on the faces of many impoverished and needy people in poverty stricken Uganda, unfortunately it was short lived and in a very small project area."
Earlier this year ART gave £2,000 towards a trip by nine students from Darwen Aldridge Community Academy to Uganda.
A Comic Relief's statement said:"Between 2001 and 2007 Comic Relief awarded the Africa Relief Trust grants totalling £170,000 for work to support people living with HIV/AIDS in northern Uganda. Comic Relief is committed to ensuring the money we give as grants is spent as agreed, which is why we make phased payments and guarantees have to show us how they have spent the previous money before receiving the next instalment. The final instalment of the grant was awarded in 2007. Comic Relief was satisfied that this grant was spent as it was intended."
A Charity Commission spokeswoman said: "As our investigation is ongoing we will not be making any further comments regarding the Africa Relief Trust."
'None of ART's income has gone on anything but charitable projects'
TRUSTEE Anthony Peers said: "The Trustees of Africa Relief Trust have acted 100 per cent correctly and honestly regarding current rating legislation when accepting donated properties in a bid to raise funds and hold charity awareness events on behalf of Africa's most needy.
"In 2010 ART was dormant because fund raising had ceased and the charity was due to fold. It was at this point that I was appointed as trustee but it is only during the last 18 months that ART has been successfully active.
"On numerous occasions ART have offered to meet with the Charities Commission at their London headquarters but on each occasion they have cancelled, therefore ART have not had an opportunity to explain their actions.
"ART has funded five water boreholes in Northern Uganda and one in South Sudan at a cost of £51,000 since October 2012.
"This year we have funded the construction and furnishing of a primary school in Northern Uganda.
"Many councils' non domestic-rating staff do not understand the current legislation regarding empty property rates. This continues to disrupt our need to further raise awareness for our lifesaving projects.
"None of ART's income has been spent on anything other than charitable projects in Uganda and South Sudan."
'The commission has issued alerts to charities warning them of the risks'
AN official statement, issued on July 25, says: "The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into Africa Relief Trust.
"The Commission opened a regulatory compliance case into the charity in September 2011 after concerns were raised regarding its business rates relief arrangements.
"As the case progressed, the commission's concerns about the risks to the charity's assets and about the trustees' failure to provide full and complete information mounted.
"Statutory inquiries are opened to investigate regulatory concerns that the commission considers the most serious and allow the use of legal powers, including powers to direct trustees or others.
"The purpose of the inquiry is to examine regulatory concerns including whether the charity trustees have properly discharged their trustee duties when making decisions to enter into tenancy agreements and occupy those properties to further their charitable purposes and whether any benefit to the landlord or other parties is incidental to that.
"The commission has issued alerts to charities warning them of the risks associated with business rates relief."
Owners can avoid business rates
Full business rates are due on empty commercial properties that remain unoccupied after three months.
Charities occupying commercial property qualify for a mandatory 80 per cent discount on business rates, provided the property is used wholly or mainly for charitable purposes. The local authority has discretion to grant the remaining 20 per cent.
The Charity Commission is aware of cases where charities are approached by retailers and landlords of hard to let property to enter into tenancy agreements relieving them of the requirement to pay full business rates.
It can be advantageous for charities to enter such agreements to lease accommodation for charitable uses, for low or nominal rents. They also sometimes receive donations from landlords that reflect a percentage of the business rates saved.
These arrangements can represent a significant risk for charities if they are not making sufficient use of the premises for charitable purposes and become liable for the full business rate.
 

Commission opens Africa Relief Trust business rates inquiry

Finance | Jonathan Last | 26 Jul 2013
http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/assets/images/B-print-20x20.gif http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/assets/images/B-share-20x20.gif http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/assets/images/B-send-20x20.gif
The Charity Commission has opened a statutory inquiry into Africa Relief Trust over its business rates relief arrangements.

The sector regulator understands that the charity has been holding rented properties 'on standby' to be used for raising awareness at an unspecified future time, meanwhile claiming the 80 per cent business rates relief charity properties enjoy.

Africa Relief Trust, which works with poverty, education and sickness in Uganda, was originally the subject of a Commission regulatory compliance case over its rate relief arrangements in September 2011.

As it looked deeper into the situation, the Commission became increasingly concerned about the risks to the charity's assets and about the trustees' failure to provide full and complete information. It opened its inquiry on 12 July 2013.

"The purpose of the inquiry," a Commission spokeswoman said in a statement, "is to examine regulatory concerns including whether the charity trustees have properly discharged their trustee duties when making decisions to enter into tenancy agreements and occupy those properties to further their charitable purposes and whether any benefit to the landlord or other parties is incidental to that."
The Commission spokeswoman added that it will publish a report after its investigation has concluded.  
Anthony Peers, a trustee at Africa Relief Trust, toldcivilsociety.co.uk: "We have been requesting a meeting with the Charity Commission and we've been prepared to travel down to London [from Lancashire] for it.
"Unfortunately, the Commission has changed the meeting date and cancelled on several occasions."

Rate relief a hot issue

Two other registered charities were recently taken to court regarding business rate relief, both adding to the Commission's concerns about Africa Relief Trust.
The Public Safety Charitable Trust was found liable for business rates costs while Kenya Aid Programme awaits an outcome on whether it is liable for rates totalling £1.6m. 

The issue of charities enjoying reduced business rates has also been in the news recently because of
 a consultation on the issue in Wales.
And losing rates relief continues to be one of the major concerns that charity retailers express to Charity Finance's annual Charity Shops Survey, with the issue shooting up the list in this year's edition, out in October.
 
 
Charity Commission opens statutory inquiry into
Africa Relief Trust
25 July 2012
The Charity Commission, the independent regulator of charities in England and Wales has opened a
statutory inquiry into Africa Relief Trust (registered charity 1077946 ).
The Commission opened a regulatory compliance case into the charity in September 2011 after
concerns were raised regarding its business rates relief arrangements. As the case progressed, the
Commission's concerns about the risks to the charity's assets and about the trustees' failure to
provide full and complete information mounted. In addition, two other registered charities were
recently taken to court regarding business rates relief; one was found liable for business rates costs
while the other charity still awaits an outcome on whether it is liable for rates totalling 1.6million .
These verdicts added to the concerns of the Commission and the regulator opened its inquiry on 12
July 2013.
Statutory inquiries are opened to investigate regulatory concerns that the Commission considers the
most serious and allow the use of legal powers, including powers to direct trustees or others.
The purpose of the inquiry is to examine regulatory concerns including whether the charity trustees
have properly discharged their trustee duties when making decisions to enter into tenancy
agreements and occupy those properties to further their charitable purposes and whether any benefit
to the landlord or other parties is incidental to that.
The Commission has issued alerts to charities warning them of the risks associated with business
rates relief.
It is normal practice for the Commission to publish a report after an investigation has concluded.
Reports of previous inquiries by the Commission are available on its website.
Ends
PR 32/13
Notes to Editors
For press enquiries contact pressenquiries@charitycommission.gsi.gov.uk
1. The Charity Commission is the independent regulator of charities in England and Wales. See
www.charitycommission.gov.uk for further information.
2. Our mission is to be the independent registrar and regulator of charities in England and Wales,
acting in the public's interest, to ensure that:
Charity Commission opens statutory inquiry into Africa Relief Trust by Charity Commission - 23/12/2014 14:13:50 Page 2 of 2
 
 
 

Africa Relief Trust criticises regulator for failing to meet before statutory inquiry

14 August 2013 by David Ainsworth, Be the First to Comment

The Charity Commission has opened an inquiry into the charity over its business rates relief arrangements

The Charity Commission has been criticised by Africa Relief Trust for failing to meet it before opening a statutory inquiry.
The commission last month opened an inquiry into the charity, set up to work with poor people in Uganda, over its "business rates relief arrangements".
The commission said it understood the charity had rented properties and kept them on standby to be used for raising charity awareness.
Anthony Peers, a trustee of Art, said in a statement that his charity was legitimately claiming rate relief on empty properties on the basis that when they were next used, they would be put to a charitable use. He said that the Rating (Empty Properties) Act 2007 states that a charity can claim 100 per cent rate relief on empty property if it appears that the next use will be "wholly or mainly" for charitable purposes.
Peers said: "On numerous occasions Art has offered to meet the Charity Commission at its London headquarters but on each occasion it has cancelled, therefore Art has not had an opportunity to explain its actions."
He said trustees of Art "have acted 100 per cent correctly and honestly regarding current rating legislation" and that the properties concerned were "intended for future charitable use by Art and numerous other African charities in a bid to raise funds and hold charity awareness events."
Peers said that Meyrick Gillis, a company that helps property owners reduce the business rates they pay on empty properties, had guaranteed that "any costs relating to non-domestic rates owed will be paid by the company on the charities' behalf" and that "funds are also in place from the company should legal representation be required".
Peers said: "Art has complied with ratings legislation as stated above and therefore should receive 100 per cent mandatory empty property relief until occupation commences, then 80 per cent while in occupation."
The commission is also looking into two other charities over business rates relief arrangements. In June, the regulator opened an inquiry into the Public Safety Charitable Trust after the High Court found that it had not met the rules for charitable occupation. The charity, which was wound up in the High Court last month, now faces a multi-million-pound bill from three local authorities
The other, the Kenya Aid Programme, has been involved in a dispute with Sheffield City Council over £1.6m of unpaid rates.
In both cases the charities have taken over the occupation of privately owned properties and claimed an 80 per cent discount in business rates.
But Peers said that both these charities were claiming rate relief on a different basis to his own organisation.
A spokeswoman for the commission said she did not want to comment on an ongoing inquiry.
 
 
 



__._,_.___

Posted by: Didier IBWILAKWINGI EKOM <d_ibwila@yahoo.fr>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles

----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

The principal key root causes that lead to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 that affected all Rwandan ethnic groups were:

1)The majority Hutu community’s fear of the return of the discriminatory monarchy system that was practiced by the minority Tutsi community against the enslaved majority Hutu community for about 500 years

2)The Hutu community’s fear of Kagame’s guerrilla that committed massacres in the North of the country and other parts of the countries including assassinations of Rwandan politicians.

3) The Rwandan people felt abandoned by the international community ( who was believed to support Kagame’s guerrilla) and then decided to defend themselves with whatever means they had against the advance of Kagame’ guerrilla supported by Ugandan, Tanzanian and Ethiopian armies and other Western powers.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions.

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions. Among Kagame’s rebels who were fighting against the Rwandan government, there were foreigners, mainly Ugandan fighters who were hired to kill and rape innocent Rwandan people in Rwanda and refugees in DRC.

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

SUMMARY : THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE BRITISH BUDGET SUPPORT AND GEO-STRATEGIC AMBITIONS

United Kingdom's Proxy Wars in Africa: The Case of Rwanda and DR Congo:

The Rwandan genocide and 6,000,000 Congolese and Hutu refugees killed are the culminating point of a long UK’s battle to expand their influence to the African Great Lakes Region. UK supported Kagame’s guerrilla war by providing military support and money. The UK refused to intervene in Rwanda during the genocide to allow Kagame to take power by military means that triggered the genocide. Kagame’s fighters and their families were on the Ugandan payroll paid by UK budget support.


· 4 Heads of State assassinated in the francophone African Great Lakes Region.
· 2,000,000 people died in Hutu and Tutsi genocides in Rwanda, Burundi and RD.Congo.
· 600,000 Hutu refugees killed in R.D.Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Rep of Congo.
· 6,000,000 Congolese dead.
· 8,000,000 internal displaced people in Rwanda, Burundi and DR. Congo.
· 500,000 permanent Rwandan and Burundian Hutu refugees, and Congolese refugees around the world.
· English language expansion to Rwanda to replace the French language.
· 20,000 Kagame’s fighters paid salaries from the British Budget Support from 1986 to present.
· £500,000 of British taxpayer’s money paid, so far, to Kagame and his cronies through the budget support, SWAPs, Tutsi-dominated parliament, consultancy, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs.
· Kagame has paid back the British aid received to invade Rwanda and to strengthen his political power by joining the East African Community together with Burundi, joining the Commonwealth, imposing the English Language to Rwandans to replace the French language; helping the British to establish businesses and to access to jobs in Rwanda, and to exploit minerals in D.R.Congo.



Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres

Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres
Kagame killed 200,000 Hutus from all regions of the country, the elderly and children who were left by their relatives, the disabled were burned alive. Other thousands of people were killed in several camps of displaced persons including Kibeho camp. All these war crimes remain unpunished.The British news reporters were accompanying Kagame’s fighters on day-by-day basis and witnessed these massacres, but they never reported on this.

Jobs

Download Documents from Amnesty International

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.

25,000  Hutu bodies  floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.
The British irrational, extremist, partisan,biased, one-sided media and politicians have disregarded Kagame war crimes e.g. the Kibeho camp massacres, massacres of innocents Hutu refugees in DR. Congo. The British media have been supporting Kagame since he invaded Rwanda by organising the propaganda against the French over the Rwandan genocide, suppressing the truth about the genocide and promoting the impunity of Kagame and his cronies in the African Great Lakes Region. For the British, Rwanda does not need democracy, Rwanda is the African Israel; and Kagame and his guerilla fighters are heroes.The extremist British news reporters including Fergal Keane, Chris Simpson, Chris McGreal, Mark Doyle, etc. continue to hate the Hutus communities and to polarise the Rwandan society.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.

Kagame  political  ambitions triggered the genocide.
Kagame’s guerrilla war was aimed at accessing to power at any cost. He rejected all attempts and advice that could stop his military adventures including the cease-fire, political negotiations and cohabitation, and UN peacekeeping interventions. He ignored all warnings that could have helped him to manage the war without tragic consequences. Either you supported Kagame’ s wars and you are now his friend, or you were against his wars and you are his enemy. Therefore, Kagame as the Rwandan strong man now, you have to apologise to him for having been against his war and condemned his war crimes, or accept to be labelled as having been involved in the genocide. All key Kagame’s fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are the ones who hold key positions in Rwandan army and government for the last 15 years. They continue to be supported and advised by the British including Tony Blair, Andrew Mitchell MP, and the British army senior officials.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support  financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.
Genocide propaganda and fabrications are used by the so-called British scholars, news reporters and investigative journalists to promote their CVs and to get income out of the genocide through the selling of their books, providing testimonies against the French, access to consultancy contracts from the UN and Kagame, and participation in conferences and lectures in Rwanda, UK and internationally about genocide. Genocide propaganda has become a lucrative business for Kagame and the British. Anyone who condemned or did not support Kagame’s war is now in jail in Rwanda under the gacaca courts system suuported by British tax payer's money, or his/she is on arrest warrant if he/she managed to flee the Kagame’s regime. Others have fled the country and are still fleeing now. Many others Rwandans are being persecuted in their own country. Kagame is waiting indefinitely for the apologies from other players who warn him or who wanted to help to ensure that political negotiations take place between Kagame and the former government he was fighting against. Britain continues to supply foreign aid to Kagame and his cronies with media reports highlighting economic successes of Rwanda. Such reports are flawed and are aimed at misleading the British public to justify the use of British taxpayers’ money. Kagame and his cronies continue to milk British taxpayers’ money under the British budget support. This started from 1986 through the British budget support to Uganda until now.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the  Rwandan genocide.
No apologies yet to the Rwandan people. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway for Kagame to access power in Rwanda. The British media, politicians, and the so-called British scholars took the role of obstructing the search for the truth and justice; and of denying this assassination on behalf of General Kagame. General Paul Kagame has been obliging the whole world to apologise for his mistakes and war crimes. The UK’s way to apologise has been pumping massive aid into Rwanda's crony government and parliement; and supporting Kagame though media campaigns.

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame
Kagame receives the British massive aid through the budget support, British excessive consultancy, sector wide programmes, the Tutsi-dominated parliament, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs; for political, economic and English language expansion to Rwanda. The British aid to Rwanda is not for all Rwandans. It is for Kagame himself and his Tutsi cronies.

Paul Kagame' actvities as former rebel

Africa

UN News Centre - Africa

The Africa Report - Latest

IRIN - Great Lakes

This blog reports the crimes that remain unpunished and the impunity that has generated a continuous cycle of massacres in many parts of Africa. In many cases, the perpetrators of the crimes seem to have acted in the knowledge that they would not be held to account for their actions.

The need to fight this impunity has become even clearer with the massacres and genocide in many parts of Africa and beyond.

The blog also addresses issues such as Rwanda War Crimes, Rwandan Refugee massacres in Dr Congo, genocide, African leaders’ war crimes and crimes against humanity, Africa war criminals, Africa crimes against humanity, Africa Justice.

-The British relentless and long running battle to become the sole player and gain new grounds of influence in the francophone African Great Lakes Region has led to the expulsion of other traditional players from the region, or strained diplomatic relations between the countries of the region and their traditional friends. These new tensions are even encouraged by the British using a variety of political and economic manoeuvres.

-General Kagame has been echoing the British advice that Rwanda does not need any loan or aid from Rwandan traditional development partners, meaning that British aid is enough to solve all Rwandan problems.

-The British obsession for the English Language expansion has become a tyranny that has led to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, dictatorial regimes, human rights violations, mass killings, destruction of families, communities and cultures, permanent refugees and displaced persons in the African Great Lakes region.


- Rwanda, a country that is run by a corrupt clique of minority-tutsi is governed with institutional discrmination, human rights violations, dictatorship, authoritarianism and autocracy, as everybody would expect.