The dictator Kagame at UN

The dictator Kagame at UN
Dictators like Kagame who have changed their national constitutions to remain indefinitely on power should not be involved in UN high level and global activities including chairing UN meetings

Why has the UN ignored its own report about the massacres of Hutu refugees in DRC ?

The UN has ignored its own reports, NGOs and media reports about the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Hutu in DRC Congo (estimated to be more than 400,000) by Kagame when he attacked Hutu refugee camps in Eastern DRC in 1996. This barbaric killings and human rights violations were perpetrated by Kagame’s RPF with the approval of UK and USA and with sympathetic understanding and knowledge of UNHCR and international NGOs which were operating in the refugees camps. According to the UN, NGO and media reports between 1993 and 2003 women and girls were raped. Men slaughtered. Refugees killed with machetes and sticks. The attacks of refugees also prevented humanitarian organisations to help many other refugees and were forced to die from cholera and other diseases. Other refugees who tried to return to Rwanda where killed on their way by RFI and did not reach their homes. No media, no UNHCR, no NGO were there to witness these massacres. When Kagame plans to kill, he makes sure no NGO and no media are prevent. Kagame always kills at night.

18 Nov 2014

Re: [AfricaRealities] Central African peacekeeping force gears up for action

 

Thanks for this report.

Sincerely,

Pierre Chekem
Partnership Coordonator
tel(237)77 77 9962
====================================
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 15/11/14, Samuel Desire sam4des@yahoo.com [AfricaRealities] <AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Subject: [AfricaRealities] Central African peacekeeping force gears up for action
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>, "africarealities@yahoogroups.com" <africarealities@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Saturday, 15 November, 2014, 23:23
















 









Central African peacekeeping force gears up
for actionCOMMENTEMAILPRINTEASY READSHAREPhoto: Laudes Mbon/IRINCEEAC troops
land on a beach in the Republic of Congo as part of
multinational manouevrersLOANGO, SOUTHERN CONGO,
10 November 2014 (IRIN) - With hundreds of soldiers from its
member states successfully completing a series of joint
exercises and manoeuvres in Congo, the Economic Community of
Central African States (CEEAC) says its Multinational Force
for Central Africa (FOMAC), is now ready to intervene in
local conflicts and be part of global anti-terrorism
initiatives. 

The recently
completed Loango 2014 operations
brought troops from eight of CEEAC's 10 member countries
(Angola, Burundi, Cameroon, CAR, Chad, Congo, Democratic
Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and Sao Tome et

Principe - Rwanda may rejoin) to Loango in the south of
Congo. 

During 10 days of intense
exercises, Congolese,
Angolan and Cameroonian soldiers disembarked from a vessel
supplied by Equatorial Guinea. On land, they constructed a
field hospital and staged simulated exercises in which

hostages were liberated and a rebel leader was captured and
removed to a safe location. The operations involved both
ordinary soldiers and more specialist parachute units. In
overall command was Congolese Chief of Staff Gen Blanchard
Guy Okoï.

Presidents Denis Sassou of
Congo, Ali Bongo Ondimba of Gabon and Obianga Nguema of
Equatorial Guinea were among the guests at a closing
ceremony on 29 October. Ahmad Allam-Mi, a former Chadian
foreign minister, now CEEAC's secretary-general, said the
organization had shown how quickly it could respond to human
needs in time of crisis. "Our force is capable of bringing
help to the population," Allam-Mi emphasized. 

There was a strong emphasis in
Loango on fighting terrorism in central Africa. Gabon
Defence Minister Ernest Mpouho Epigat pointed to the
challenges posed by maritime piracy, but also warned that
the Nigerian Islamist movement Boko Haram was in striking
distance of central African nations. "Cameroon is now on
the frontline," Epigat warned. "It is good that the
countries of the sub-region hold this kind of exercise to
see how we can pool our personnel and resources to respond
to these threats and push them as far away as we
can." 

A bit of
history 

Until recently,
CEEAC was seen as slow to develop a serious military
profile. Formed in 1983, it was virtually moribund for much
of the 1990s, falling victim to regional rivalries and
having a lack of shared priorities. Geographically, it seems
an incongruous grouping of nations, stretching from Sao
Tomé and Principe in the Atlantic to Chad. 

CEEAC used an extraordinary summit in
Libreville (Gabon) in February 1998 to put itself on a new
footing. At a subsequent meeting in Malabo (Equatorial
Guinea) in 1999, heads of state outlined the need to work
more closely on peace and security issues. Tracing CEEAC's
history, security analyst Angela Meyer observed in Peace and Security
Cooperation in Central Africa: Challenges and
Prospects: "The lessons from years of conflict and
crises made it clear that regional economic cooperation
could not succeed without regional peace and
security." 

Progress was initially
slow. Member states were bitterly divided over the conflict
in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which broke out in
1998. Chad and Angola sent troops to defend embattled
President Laurent Kabila; Rwanda and Burundi backed rebels
advancing on Kinshasa. 

Stronger regional framework takes
shape 

But a stronger
regional security framework did take shape. The Council of
Peace and Security of Central Africa (COPAX), operational
since 2004, was set up to guide regional policy on defence
and security and given a mandate not only to deploy civilian
and military missions, but to help mediate in
crises. 

The Commission of Defence
and Security, made up of military and police chiefs, works
under a regional Planning Element and military
headquarters,
based in Libreville. CEEAC has at its disposal a Strategic
Analysis Group and a Rapid Alert Mechanism for Central
Africa, operating as an early warning system. Pointe Noire
in Congo hosts a Regional Centre for Maritime
Security. 

The collective security
initiatives taken in Central Africa are in line with
priorities outlined for the African Union's (AU) African
Peace and Security Architecture (APSA), which stresses the
need for viable regional structures that replicate what the
AU is doing at continental level. For example, the AU wants
to see regional versions of its Peace and Security Council
(PSC) and its Continental Early Warning System, which
CEEAC's MARAC seeks to emulate. 

Critical to the AU's long-term security plans is the
African Standby Force (ASF), which has the right to intervene in a member
state "in grave circumstances, namely war crimes, genocide
and crimes against humanity". The ASF's viability is
premised on efficient standby arrangements with Africa's
five sub-regions, which should "enable Africans to respond
swiftly to a crisis unhampered by any heavy political and
instrumental burden."  

In
principle, each regional bloc now has its own contingent
earmarked for ASF deployments, with FOMAC joining parallel
forces in other parts of the continent. An AU review of APSA's progress in 2010
acknowledged serious problems with each region
in delivering on commitments, pointing to ongoing conflicts
and a lack of operational capacity as major
handicaps.  

FOMAC - a force in progress 

FOMAC was not singled out for criticism, but
clearly needed to become more professional and better
coordinated. 

Set up in 2002,
FOMAC's standing orders identified the force as being made
up of military, police, gendarmerie and civilian personnel,
ready to carry out "peace, security and humanitarian
assistance missions". FOMAC's duties also extend to
disarmament and demobilization work and control of fraud and
organizational crimes. 

Compared to
the experience gained by Economic Community of West African
States (ECOWAS) troops in West African conflicts, including
Liberia,
Sierra Leone and Guinea-Bissau, Central African soldiers
saw little combat in regional missions, but no shortage of
capacity-building and practical collaboration. 

Loango 14, which was months
in the planning, was the latest in a series of multinational
training events, going back nearly a decade, which have
become increasing ambitious in their scale and objectives.
Chad played host to the Barh el Ghazel exercises in 2005 and
2007. Over 3,500 personnel took part in Kwanza 2010 in
Angola. 

Filling a
vacuum in CAR 

It was the
succession of crises in CAR which gave Central African
troops their first exposure to a regional war zone. FOMUC,
the multinational force of the six-nation Economic and
Monetary Community of Central Africa (CEMAC), was stationed
in
Bangui with a brief to support the CAR Armed Forces, which
had been hit by a wave of mutinies, threatening the rule of
President Ange-Félix Patassé. (CEMAC members are: Gabon,
Cameroon, CAR, Chad, Congo and Equatorial Guinea). 

FOMUC was superseded in 2008 by the Mission
of Consolidation of Peace in CAR (MICOPAX - a specific
mission of FOMAC). Funded in part by the EU and working
closely with French troops, its mandate was to help
establish peace and security.

After a
long period of low-intensity guerrilla activity and hesitant
peacebuilding, MICOPAX was hinting at a withdrawal by
September 2012. A Chadian commander told Radio France Internationale
(RFI): "Elections have been held and we are now in a
phase of consolidating the peace."  

But the emergence of Séléka, a newly
formed, heavily armed rebel coalition ended that
complacency. As Séléka made critical territorial gains
from December 2012, CEEAC called for more troops, but could
not prevent the fall of Bangui. 

As
CEEAC tried, with difficulty, to drive the peace process
outside CAR, MICOPAX numbers tripled, with over 2,000 troops
deployed. MICOPAX 2's brief was ambitious: to guarantee
security, provide protection and help restore police and
judicial system. The leading contributors were Congo,
Burundi, Chad and Rwanda, although Rwanda had left CEEAC in
2007. 

Often overshadowed by the
French military presence, FOMAC again faced accusations of
poor leadership and incoherence and having
little real presence outside Bangui. FOMAC's Chadian
contingent was accused of aligning itself with the Séléka
rebels, a charge strongly denied by the Chadian
authorities. 

In December 2013,
after lengthy talks between the AU and CEEAC, peacekeeping
operations were formally transferred to the African-led
International Support Mission to the Central African
Republic (MISCA), which in turn transferred authority to the UN
Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in CAR
(MINUSCA) in September 2014.  

Troops from CEMAC countries still make up the vast
majority of troops deployed in the CAR. 

The
verdict on MICOPAX 

FOMAC's role in the country has been much
criticised. But Alex Vines, head of the Africa programme at
the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham
House), said FOMAC soldiers had endeavoured to protect the
civilian population, perhaps more effectively than other
outside forces. "It was not a particularly exemplary
operation", Vines told IRIN. "But the troops were there
in very difficult circumstances." 

Vines, who has authored a 10-year study of the AU's approach to
continental security, A Decade of African Peace and
Security, Architecture, said all of the regional forces
meant to contribute to the ASF fell short of the AU's
requirements.
He noted the lack of a regional leader, the role played
(controversially) by Nigeria in West Africa in the past, and
also of states, like Angola, having a stake in different
regional blocs. 

Rwanda rejoins the fold 

Rwanda pulled out of CEEAC in 2007, pleading
insufficient funds, and engagements in too many other
regional blocs, the East Africa Community (EAC), for
example. The deployment of Rwanda troops in the CAR as part
of MICOPAX suggested that Rwanda was ready to re-engage with
CEEAC. This was confirmed by Rwandan Foreign Minister Louise
Mushikiwab at Loanga, who said her country had come a long
way from the genocide of 1994 and wanted to play a full role
in CEEAC. "We have decided to rejoin our brothers and
sisters in Central Africa with whom we share an important
heritage," Mushikiwabo explained. "At the next
of its summits, we will reintegrate with CEEAC. With great
pleasure we will come back into the heart of the
family." 

lmm/cs/cb 
Theme (s): Conflict, Security,[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of
the United Nations]Central African peacekeeping force gears up for
action
       Central
African peacekeeping force gears up for
actionWith hundreds of soldiers
from its member states successfully completing a series of
joint exercises and manoeuvres in Congo, the Economic
Community of Central
Afri...View
on www.irinnews.orgPreview
by Yahoo 
















__._,_.___

Posted by: Pierre Chekem <p_chekem@yahoo.co.uk>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

Yahoo Groups
Test Campaign
subject line for test

----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

The principal key root causes that lead to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 that affected all Rwandan ethnic groups were:

1)The majority Hutu community’s fear of the return of the discriminatory monarchy system that was practiced by the minority Tutsi community against the enslaved majority Hutu community for about 500 years

2)The Hutu community’s fear of Kagame’s guerrilla that committed massacres in the North of the country and other parts of the countries including assassinations of Rwandan politicians.

3) The Rwandan people felt abandoned by the international community ( who was believed to support Kagame’s guerrilla) and then decided to defend themselves with whatever means they had against the advance of Kagame’ guerrilla supported by Ugandan, Tanzanian and Ethiopian armies and other Western powers.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions.

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions. Among Kagame’s rebels who were fighting against the Rwandan government, there were foreigners, mainly Ugandan fighters who were hired to kill and rape innocent Rwandan people in Rwanda and refugees in DRC.

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

SUMMARY : THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE BRITISH BUDGET SUPPORT AND GEO-STRATEGIC AMBITIONS

United Kingdom's Proxy Wars in Africa: The Case of Rwanda and DR Congo:

The Rwandan genocide and 6,000,000 Congolese and Hutu refugees killed are the culminating point of a long UK’s battle to expand their influence to the African Great Lakes Region. UK supported Kagame’s guerrilla war by providing military support and money. The UK refused to intervene in Rwanda during the genocide to allow Kagame to take power by military means that triggered the genocide. Kagame’s fighters and their families were on the Ugandan payroll paid by UK budget support.


· 4 Heads of State assassinated in the francophone African Great Lakes Region.
· 2,000,000 people died in Hutu and Tutsi genocides in Rwanda, Burundi and RD.Congo.
· 600,000 Hutu refugees killed in R.D.Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Rep of Congo.
· 6,000,000 Congolese dead.
· 8,000,000 internal displaced people in Rwanda, Burundi and DR. Congo.
· 500,000 permanent Rwandan and Burundian Hutu refugees, and Congolese refugees around the world.
· English language expansion to Rwanda to replace the French language.
· 20,000 Kagame’s fighters paid salaries from the British Budget Support from 1986 to present.
· £500,000 of British taxpayer’s money paid, so far, to Kagame and his cronies through the budget support, SWAPs, Tutsi-dominated parliament, consultancy, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs.
· Kagame has paid back the British aid received to invade Rwanda and to strengthen his political power by joining the East African Community together with Burundi, joining the Commonwealth, imposing the English Language to Rwandans to replace the French language; helping the British to establish businesses and to access to jobs in Rwanda, and to exploit minerals in D.R.Congo.



Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres

Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres
Kagame killed 200,000 Hutus from all regions of the country, the elderly and children who were left by their relatives, the disabled were burned alive. Other thousands of people were killed in several camps of displaced persons including Kibeho camp. All these war crimes remain unpunished.The British news reporters were accompanying Kagame’s fighters on day-by-day basis and witnessed these massacres, but they never reported on this.

Jobs

Download Documents from Amnesty International

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.

25,000  Hutu bodies  floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.
The British irrational, extremist, partisan,biased, one-sided media and politicians have disregarded Kagame war crimes e.g. the Kibeho camp massacres, massacres of innocents Hutu refugees in DR. Congo. The British media have been supporting Kagame since he invaded Rwanda by organising the propaganda against the French over the Rwandan genocide, suppressing the truth about the genocide and promoting the impunity of Kagame and his cronies in the African Great Lakes Region. For the British, Rwanda does not need democracy, Rwanda is the African Israel; and Kagame and his guerilla fighters are heroes.The extremist British news reporters including Fergal Keane, Chris Simpson, Chris McGreal, Mark Doyle, etc. continue to hate the Hutus communities and to polarise the Rwandan society.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.

Kagame  political  ambitions triggered the genocide.
Kagame’s guerrilla war was aimed at accessing to power at any cost. He rejected all attempts and advice that could stop his military adventures including the cease-fire, political negotiations and cohabitation, and UN peacekeeping interventions. He ignored all warnings that could have helped him to manage the war without tragic consequences. Either you supported Kagame’ s wars and you are now his friend, or you were against his wars and you are his enemy. Therefore, Kagame as the Rwandan strong man now, you have to apologise to him for having been against his war and condemned his war crimes, or accept to be labelled as having been involved in the genocide. All key Kagame’s fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are the ones who hold key positions in Rwandan army and government for the last 15 years. They continue to be supported and advised by the British including Tony Blair, Andrew Mitchell MP, and the British army senior officials.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support  financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.
Genocide propaganda and fabrications are used by the so-called British scholars, news reporters and investigative journalists to promote their CVs and to get income out of the genocide through the selling of their books, providing testimonies against the French, access to consultancy contracts from the UN and Kagame, and participation in conferences and lectures in Rwanda, UK and internationally about genocide. Genocide propaganda has become a lucrative business for Kagame and the British. Anyone who condemned or did not support Kagame’s war is now in jail in Rwanda under the gacaca courts system suuported by British tax payer's money, or his/she is on arrest warrant if he/she managed to flee the Kagame’s regime. Others have fled the country and are still fleeing now. Many others Rwandans are being persecuted in their own country. Kagame is waiting indefinitely for the apologies from other players who warn him or who wanted to help to ensure that political negotiations take place between Kagame and the former government he was fighting against. Britain continues to supply foreign aid to Kagame and his cronies with media reports highlighting economic successes of Rwanda. Such reports are flawed and are aimed at misleading the British public to justify the use of British taxpayers’ money. Kagame and his cronies continue to milk British taxpayers’ money under the British budget support. This started from 1986 through the British budget support to Uganda until now.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the  Rwandan genocide.
No apologies yet to the Rwandan people. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway for Kagame to access power in Rwanda. The British media, politicians, and the so-called British scholars took the role of obstructing the search for the truth and justice; and of denying this assassination on behalf of General Kagame. General Paul Kagame has been obliging the whole world to apologise for his mistakes and war crimes. The UK’s way to apologise has been pumping massive aid into Rwanda's crony government and parliement; and supporting Kagame though media campaigns.

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame
Kagame receives the British massive aid through the budget support, British excessive consultancy, sector wide programmes, the Tutsi-dominated parliament, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs; for political, economic and English language expansion to Rwanda. The British aid to Rwanda is not for all Rwandans. It is for Kagame himself and his Tutsi cronies.

Paul Kagame' actvities as former rebel

Africa

UN News Centre - Africa

The Africa Report - Latest

IRIN - Great Lakes

This blog reports the crimes that remain unpunished and the impunity that has generated a continuous cycle of massacres in many parts of Africa. In many cases, the perpetrators of the crimes seem to have acted in the knowledge that they would not be held to account for their actions.

The need to fight this impunity has become even clearer with the massacres and genocide in many parts of Africa and beyond.

The blog also addresses issues such as Rwanda War Crimes, Rwandan Refugee massacres in Dr Congo, genocide, African leaders’ war crimes and crimes against humanity, Africa war criminals, Africa crimes against humanity, Africa Justice.

-The British relentless and long running battle to become the sole player and gain new grounds of influence in the francophone African Great Lakes Region has led to the expulsion of other traditional players from the region, or strained diplomatic relations between the countries of the region and their traditional friends. These new tensions are even encouraged by the British using a variety of political and economic manoeuvres.

-General Kagame has been echoing the British advice that Rwanda does not need any loan or aid from Rwandan traditional development partners, meaning that British aid is enough to solve all Rwandan problems.

-The British obsession for the English Language expansion has become a tyranny that has led to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, dictatorial regimes, human rights violations, mass killings, destruction of families, communities and cultures, permanent refugees and displaced persons in the African Great Lakes region.


- Rwanda, a country that is run by a corrupt clique of minority-tutsi is governed with institutional discrmination, human rights violations, dictatorship, authoritarianism and autocracy, as everybody would expect.