The dictator Kagame at UN

The dictator Kagame at UN
Dictators like Kagame who have changed their national constitutions to remain indefinitely on power should not be involved in UN high level and global activities including chairing UN meetings

Why has the UN ignored its own report about the massacres of Hutu refugees in DRC ?

The UN has ignored its own reports, NGOs and media reports about the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Hutu in DRC Congo (estimated to be more than 400,000) by Kagame when he attacked Hutu refugee camps in Eastern DRC in 1996. This barbaric killings and human rights violations were perpetrated by Kagame’s RPF with the approval of UK and USA and with sympathetic understanding and knowledge of UNHCR and international NGOs which were operating in the refugees camps. According to the UN, NGO and media reports between 1993 and 2003 women and girls were raped. Men slaughtered. Refugees killed with machetes and sticks. The attacks of refugees also prevented humanitarian organisations to help many other refugees and were forced to die from cholera and other diseases. Other refugees who tried to return to Rwanda where killed on their way by RFI and did not reach their homes. No media, no UNHCR, no NGO were there to witness these massacres. When Kagame plans to kill, he makes sure no NGO and no media are prevent. Kagame always kills at night.

28 Oct 2012

Re: Working Groups and terminated Sanctions Committees

--- On Sat, 10/27/12, SYLVERE KARURANGA <Sylvere@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: SYLVERE KARURANGA <Sylvere@hotmail.com>
Subject: [YouthDemocrats] Working Groups and terminated Sanctions Committees
To: "youthdemocrats@yahoogroups.com" <youthdemocrats@yahoogroups.com>, "raya" <raya-network@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Saturday, October 27, 2012, 9:49 AM

 



http://www.un.org/sc/committees/


This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the interpretation of
speeches delivered in the other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records
of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They
should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the
delegation concerned to the Chief of the Verbatim Reporting Service, room U-506.
12-55891 (E)
*1255891*
United Nations S/PV.6850
asdfSecurity Council
Sixty-seventh year
6850th meeting
Friday, 19 October 2012, 4 p.m.
New York
Provisional
President: Mr. Rosenthal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Guatemala)
Members: Azerbaijan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Sharifov
China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Tian Lin
Colombia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Osorio
France . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Briens
Germany . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Eick
India . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Manjeev Singh Puri
Morocco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Bouchaara
Pakistan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Masood Khan
Portugal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Cabral
Russian Federation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Zhukov
South Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. Laher
Togo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. M'Beou
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland . . . . Mr. Tatham
United States of America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mr. DeLaurentis
Agenda
The situation concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo
2 12-55891
S/PV.6850
persons and refugees, with 320,000 people
displaced from their homes in North Kivu province
since the M-23 mutiny started in April 2012. It
calls on all parties, in particular the M-23, to allow
safe, timely and unhindered humanitarian access
to the areas under the control of M-23 and in the
wider region in accordance with international law,
including applicable international humanitarian
law and the guiding principles of humanitarian
assistance. It expresses concern about the shortfall
in funding for humanitarian assistance and
reiterates its call on the international community to
provide appropriate humanitarian support. It also
expresses concern at the possible negative impact
of the prevailing situation in North Kivu on the
security and humanitarian situation in South Kivu.
"The Security Council reaffirms its strong
commitment to the sovereignty, independence,
unity and territorial integrity of the Democratic
Republic of the Congo and emphasizes the need
to respect fully the principles of non-interference,
good neighbourliness and regional cooperation.
It reiterates its strong condemnation of any and
all external support to the M-23. In this regard,
the Security Council expresses deep concern at
reports indicating that such support continues to be
provided to the M-23 by neighbouring countries.
The Security Council demands that any and all
outside support to the M-23 as well as other armed
groups cease immediately.
"The Security Council calls upon all countries
in the region to condemn the M-23 as well as
other armed groups and to cooperate actively
with the Congolese authorities in disarming and
demobilizing the M-23 as well as other armed groups
and dismantling the M-23 parallel administration.
"The Security Council emphasizes the primary
responsibility of the Government of the Democratic
Republic of the Congo to reinforce State authority
and governance in eastern Democratic Republic
of the Congo, including through effective security
sector reform to allow army and police reform, and
to end impunity for abuses of human rights and
violations of international humanitarian law, and
urges the Government of the Democratic Republic
of the Congo to address issues of illegal exploitation
and smuggling of natural resources.
"The Security Council welcomes the efforts
of the United Nations Secretary-General as well
The meeting was called to order at 4.15 p.m.
Adoption of the agenda
The agenda was adopted.
The situation concerning the Democratic Republic
of the Congo
The President (spoke in Spanish): The Security
Council will now begin its consideration of the item on
its agenda.
Following consultations among the members of the
Security Council, I have been authorized to make the
following statement on behalf of the Council:
"The Security Council expresses its deep
concern regarding the deteriorating security and
humanitarian crisis in eastern Democratic Republic
of the Congo due to ongoing military and other
destabilizing activities of the 23 March Movement
(M-23) as well as other armed groups.
"The Security Council strongly condemns the
M-23 and all its attacks on the civilian population,
United Nations peacekeepers and humanitarian
actors, as well as its abuses of human rights,
including summary executions, sexual and genderbased
violence and large-scale recruitment and
use of child soldiers. The Security Council also
condemns the attempts by the M-23 to establish
a parallel administration and to undermine State
authority. The Security Council demands that
the M-23 and other armed groups, including the
Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda
(FDLR), cease immediately all forms of violence
and other destabilizing activities.
"The Security Council calls for perpetrators,
including individuals responsible for violence
against children and acts of sexual violence,
to be apprehended, brought to justice and
held accountable for violations of applicable
international law. The Security Council expresses
its intention to apply targeted sanctions against the
leadership of the M-23 and those acting in violation
of the sanctions regime and the arms embargo and
calls on all Member States to submit, as a matter
of urgency, listing proposals to the Committee
established pursuant to resolution 1533 (2004).
"The Security Council expresses its deep
concern with the increasing number of displaced
12-55891 3
S/PV.6850
as of the International Conference on the Great
Lakes Region (ICGLR), the Southern African
Development Community and the African Union,
to restore peace and security in eastern Democratic
Republic of the Congo. It also stresses the urgency
of constructive engagement and dialogue between
the Democratic Republic of the Congo and its
neighbours, especially Rwanda, and the need to
address the underlying causes of the conf lict in
eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. It calls
on the United Nations Secretary-General to continue
his good offices and to explore, when appropriate,
further high-level diplomatic mechanisms to
facilitate enhanced dialogue between relevant
parties, including on the underlying causes of the
conf lict.
"The Security Council welcomes the
establishment of the Expanded Joint Verification
Mechanism (EJVM), which was launched by the
ICGLR on 14 September as an important starting
point for rebuilding confidence between the
Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda. It
further welcomes the support provided by the United
Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUSCO)
to the EJVM and encourages, in coordination with
ICGLR members, the participation of MONUSCO,
as appropriate and within the limits of its capacities
and mandate, in the activities of the EJVM and the
reporting on any f low of arms and related materiel
across borders of eastern Democratic Republic of
the Congo.
"The Security Council takes note of the
decisions by the ICGLR and the African Union
regarding the deployment of a 'Neutral International
Force' in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
and takes note of the ongoing coordination efforts
between these organizations and the United Nations
to clarify the objectives, modalities and means of
the proposed Force in relation to MONUSCO.
"The Security Council expresses its full support
to the United Nations Group of Experts of the 1533
Committee and calls for enhanced cooperation
between all States, particularly those in the region,
and the Group of Experts, encourages further that
all parties and all States ensure cooperation with
the Group of Experts by individuals and entities
within their jurisdiction or under their control and
reiterates its demand that all parties and all States
ensure the safety of its members, and unhindered
and immediate access, in particular to persons,
documents and sites the Group of Experts deems
relevant to the execution of its mandate.
"The Security Council expresses its full
support to MONUSCO and commends the active
measures it has taken to implement its mandate
in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo,
especially protecting civilians, and encourages
the continuation of these efforts. The Security
Council requests the Secretary-General to present
to the Security Council a special report on possible
options, and their implications, for reinforcing the
ability of MONUSCO to implement its mandate,
including to protect civilians and report on f lows
of arms and related materiel across borders of
eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo,
focusing in particular on force multipliers. It calls
on all parties to cooperate fully with the Mission
and reiterates its condemnation of any attacks on
its peacekeepers. The Security Council recalls
that the Congolese Government bears the primary
responsibility for ensuring security in its territory
and protecting its civilians. The Security Council
recalls the importance of close consultations with
troop- and police-contributing countries."
This statement will be issued as a document of the
Council under the symbol S/PRST/2012/22.
The Security Council has thus concluded the present
stage of its consideration of the item on its agenda.
The meeting rose at 4.30 p.m




UN Security Council Sanctions Committees


Photo of Security-Council

SECURITY COUNCIL SANCTIONS COMMITTEES: AN OVERVIEW

Under Chapter VII of the Charter, the Security Council can take enforcement measures to maintain or restore international peace and security. Such measures range from economic and/or other sanctions not involving the use of armed force to international military action.
The use of mandatory sanctions is intended to apply pressure on a State or entity to comply with the objectives set by the Security Council without resorting to the use of force. Sanctions thus offer the Security Council an important instrument to enforce its decisions. The universal character of the United Nations makes it an especially appropriate body to establish and monitor such measures.
The Council has resorted to mandatory sanctions as an enforcement tool when peace has been threatened and diplomatic efforts have failed. The range of sanctions has included comprehensive economic and trade sanctions and/or more targeted measures such as arms embargoes, travel bans, financial or diplomatic restrictions.
At the same time, a great number of States and humanitarian organizations have expressed concerns at the possible adverse impact of sanctions on the most vulnerable segments of the population. Concerns have also been expressed at the negative impact sanctions can have on the economy of third countries.
In response to these concerns, relevant Security Council decisions have reflected a more refined approach to the design, application and implementation of mandatory sanctions. These refinements have included measures targeted at specific actors, as well as humanitarian exceptions embodied in Security Council resolutions. Targeted sanctions, for instance, can involve the freezing of assets and blocking the financial transactions of political elites or entities whose behaviour triggered sanctions in the first place. Recently, smart sanctions have been applied to conflict diamonds in African countries, where wars have been funded in part by the trade of illicit diamonds for arms and related materiel.
As part of its commitment to ensure that fair and clear procedures exist for placing individuals and entities on sanctions lists and for removing them, as well as for granting humanitarian exemptions, the Security Council, on 19 December 2006, adopted resolution 1730 (2006) by which the Council requested the Secretary-General to establish within the Secretariat (Security Council Subsidiary Organs Branch), a focal point to receive de-listing requests and perform the tasks described in the annex to that resolution. The Security Council took another significant step in this regard by establishing, by its resolution 1904 (2009) the Office of the Ombudsperson.
On 17 April 2000, the members of the Security Council established, on a temporary basis, the InformalWorking Group on General Issues of Sanctions to develop general recommendations on how to improve the effectiveness of United Nations sanctions. In 2006 the Working Group submitted its report to the Security Council (S/2006/997), which contained recommendations and best practices on how to improve sanctions.
Detailed information on each sanctions committee, including relevant measures, lists, Committee Guidelines and comprehensive documentation, including official documents and Press Releases, is available on webpages that can be accessed through the links in the column on the left.
Resolutions on General Issues Related to Sanctions

Working Groups and terminated Sanctions Committees

Active Working Groups

Terminated Sanctions Committees

Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1132 (1997) concerning Sierra Leone (Terminated pursuant to resolution 1940 (2010) of 29 September 2010)
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 918 (1994) concerning Rwanda (Terminated pursuant to resolution 1823 (2008) of 10 July 2008)
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1343 (2001) concerning Liberia(Terminated pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) of 22 December 2003, see 1518 Committee link in the column on the left)
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1298 (2000) concerning the situation between Eritrea and Ethiopia (Terminated in pursuance of Presidential Statement S/PRST/2001/14 of 15 May 2001)
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1160 (1998) (Terminated pursuant toresolution 1367 (2001) of 10 September 2001)
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 985 (1995) concerning Liberia(Terminated pursuant to resolution 1343 (2001) of 7 March 2001, see 1518 Committee link in the column on the left)
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 864 (1993) concerning the situation in Angola (Monitoring Mechanism on Sanctions against UNITA)(Terminated pursuant to resolution 1448 (2002) of 9 December 2002)
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 841 (1993) concerning Haiti (terminated pursuant to resolution 944 of 29 September 1994)
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 724 (1991) concerning Yugoslavia (terminated pursuant to resolution 1074 of 1 October 1996)
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 748 (1992) concerning the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (Terminated pursuant to resolution 1506 (2003) of 12 September 2003)
Security Council Committee established by resolution 661 (1990) concerning the situation between Iraq and Kuwait (Terminated pursuant to resolution 1483 (2003) of 22 May 2003 - see 1518 Committee link in the column on the left)
Security Council Committee established by resolution 421 (1977) concerning the question of South Africa (terminated pursuant to resolution 919 of 26 May 1994)
Security Council Committee established in pursuance of resolution 253 (1968) (terminated pursuant to resolution 460 of 21 December 1979)

Useful Links


Report of the Symposium on Enhancing the Implementation of the United Nations Security Council Sanctions (S/2007/734) 
__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
THAT WHO KEEPS SILENT IN THE MIDST OF TYRANY IS AS GUILTY OF OPPRESSION AS THE TYRANT HIMSELF. Please use the following link: https://ffdrwanda.org/Donate.html  to DONATE to the struggle for democracy in Rwanda.

Youthdemocrats is an Internet Forum aiming at furthering the 
activities of the Foundation for Freedom and Democracy in Rwanda, Inc.
We expect postings of only the highest quality, appropriate to the 
ongoing struggle for Freedom, Democracy and Justice in Rwanda, rather 
than personal messages.

Members of this group remain solely responsible for the content of 
their messages, and agree to indemnify and hold harmless the 
Foundation for Freedom and Democracy in Rwanda with respect to any 
claim based upon transmission of messages.

.

__,_._,___
at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

The principal key root causes that lead to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 that affected all Rwandan ethnic groups were:

1)The majority Hutu community’s fear of the return of the discriminatory monarchy system that was practiced by the minority Tutsi community against the enslaved majority Hutu community for about 500 years

2)The Hutu community’s fear of Kagame’s guerrilla that committed massacres in the North of the country and other parts of the countries including assassinations of Rwandan politicians.

3) The Rwandan people felt abandoned by the international community ( who was believed to support Kagame’s guerrilla) and then decided to defend themselves with whatever means they had against the advance of Kagame’ guerrilla supported by Ugandan, Tanzanian and Ethiopian armies and other Western powers.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions.

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions. Among Kagame’s rebels who were fighting against the Rwandan government, there were foreigners, mainly Ugandan fighters who were hired to kill and rape innocent Rwandan people in Rwanda and refugees in DRC.

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

SUMMARY : THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE BRITISH BUDGET SUPPORT AND GEO-STRATEGIC AMBITIONS

United Kingdom's Proxy Wars in Africa: The Case of Rwanda and DR Congo:

The Rwandan genocide and 6,000,000 Congolese and Hutu refugees killed are the culminating point of a long UK’s battle to expand their influence to the African Great Lakes Region. UK supported Kagame’s guerrilla war by providing military support and money. The UK refused to intervene in Rwanda during the genocide to allow Kagame to take power by military means that triggered the genocide. Kagame’s fighters and their families were on the Ugandan payroll paid by UK budget support.


· 4 Heads of State assassinated in the francophone African Great Lakes Region.
· 2,000,000 people died in Hutu and Tutsi genocides in Rwanda, Burundi and RD.Congo.
· 600,000 Hutu refugees killed in R.D.Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Rep of Congo.
· 6,000,000 Congolese dead.
· 8,000,000 internal displaced people in Rwanda, Burundi and DR. Congo.
· 500,000 permanent Rwandan and Burundian Hutu refugees, and Congolese refugees around the world.
· English language expansion to Rwanda to replace the French language.
· 20,000 Kagame’s fighters paid salaries from the British Budget Support from 1986 to present.
· £500,000 of British taxpayer’s money paid, so far, to Kagame and his cronies through the budget support, SWAPs, Tutsi-dominated parliament, consultancy, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs.
· Kagame has paid back the British aid received to invade Rwanda and to strengthen his political power by joining the East African Community together with Burundi, joining the Commonwealth, imposing the English Language to Rwandans to replace the French language; helping the British to establish businesses and to access to jobs in Rwanda, and to exploit minerals in D.R.Congo.


Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres

Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres
Kagame killed 200,000 Hutus from all regions of the country, the elderly and children who were left by their relatives, the disabled were burned alive. Other thousands of people were killed in several camps of displaced persons including Kibeho camp. All these war crimes remain unpunished.The British news reporters were accompanying Kagame’s fighters on day-by-day basis and witnessed these massacres, but they never reported on this.

Jobs

Loading...

Download Documents from Amnesty International

Loading...

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.
The British irrational, extremist, partisan,biased, one-sided media and politicians have disregarded Kagame war crimes e.g. the Kibeho camp massacres, massacres of innocents Hutu refugees in DR. Congo. The British media have been supporting Kagame since he invaded Rwanda by organising the propaganda against the French over the Rwandan genocide, suppressing the truth about the genocide and promoting the impunity of Kagame and his cronies in the African Great Lakes Region. For the British, Rwanda does not need democracy, Rwanda is the African Israel; and Kagame and his guerilla fighters are heroes.The extremist British news reporters including Fergal Keane, Chris Simpson, Chris McGreal, Mark Doyle, etc. continue to hate the Hutus communities and to polarise the Rwandan society.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.
Kagame’s guerrilla war was aimed at accessing to power at any cost. He rejected all attempts and advice that could stop his military adventures including the cease-fire, political negotiations and cohabitation, and UN peacekeeping interventions. He ignored all warnings that could have helped him to manage the war without tragic consequences. Either you supported Kagame’ s wars and you are now his friend, or you were against his wars and you are his enemy. Therefore, Kagame as the Rwandan strong man now, you have to apologise to him for having been against his war and condemned his war crimes, or accept to be labelled as having been involved in the genocide. All key Kagame’s fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are the ones who hold key positions in Rwandan army and government for the last 15 years. They continue to be supported and advised by the British including Tony Blair, Andrew Mitchell MP, and the British army senior officials.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.
Genocide propaganda and fabrications are used by the so-called British scholars, news reporters and investigative journalists to promote their CVs and to get income out of the genocide through the selling of their books, providing testimonies against the French, access to consultancy contracts from the UN and Kagame, and participation in conferences and lectures in Rwanda, UK and internationally about genocide. Genocide propaganda has become a lucrative business for Kagame and the British. Anyone who condemned or did not support Kagame’s war is now in jail in Rwanda under the gacaca courts system suuported by British tax payer's money, or his/she is on arrest warrant if he/she managed to flee the Kagame’s regime. Others have fled the country and are still fleeing now. Many others Rwandans are being persecuted in their own country. Kagame is waiting indefinitely for the apologies from other players who warn him or who wanted to help to ensure that political negotiations take place between Kagame and the former government he was fighting against. Britain continues to supply foreign aid to Kagame and his cronies with media reports highlighting economic successes of Rwanda. Such reports are flawed and are aimed at misleading the British public to justify the use of British taxpayers’ money. Kagame and his cronies continue to milk British taxpayers’ money under the British budget support. This started from 1986 through the British budget support to Uganda until now.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.
No apologies yet to the Rwandan people. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway for Kagame to access power in Rwanda. The British media, politicians, and the so-called British scholars took the role of obstructing the search for the truth and justice; and of denying this assassination on behalf of General Kagame. General Paul Kagame has been obliging the whole world to apologise for his mistakes and war crimes. The UK’s way to apologise has been pumping massive aid into Rwanda's crony government and parliement; and supporting Kagame though media campaigns.

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame
Kagame receives the British massive aid through the budget support, British excessive consultancy, sector wide programmes, the Tutsi-dominated parliament, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs; for political, economic and English language expansion to Rwanda. The British aid to Rwanda is not for all Rwandans. It is for Kagame himself and his Tutsi cronies.

Paul Kagame' actvities as former rebel

Africa

Loading...

UN News Centre - Africa

Loading...

The Africa Report - Latest

Loading...

IRIN - Great Lakes

Loading...

This blog reports the crimes that remain unpunished and the impunity that has generated a continuous cycle of massacres in many parts of Africa. In many cases, the perpetrators of the crimes seem to have acted in the knowledge that they would not be held to account for their actions.

The need to fight this impunity has become even clearer with the massacres and genocide in many parts of Africa and beyond.

The blog also addresses issues such as Rwanda War Crimes, Rwandan Refugee massacres in Dr Congo, genocide, African leaders’ war crimes and crimes against humanity, Africa war criminals, Africa crimes against humanity, Africa Justice.

-The British relentless and long running battle to become the sole player and gain new grounds of influence in the francophone African Great Lakes Region has led to the expulsion of other traditional players from the region, or strained diplomatic relations between the countries of the region and their traditional friends. These new tensions are even encouraged by the British using a variety of political and economic manoeuvres.

-General Kagame has been echoing the British advice that Rwanda does not need any loan or aid from Rwandan traditional development partners, meaning that British aid is enough to solve all Rwandan problems.

-The British obsession for the English Language expansion has become a tyranny that has led to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, dictatorial regimes, human rights violations, mass killings, destruction of families, communities and cultures, permanent refugees and displaced persons in the African Great Lakes region.

- Rwanda, a country that is run by a corrupt clique of minority-tutsi is governed with institutional discrmination, human rights violations, dictatorship, authoritarianism and autocracy, as everybody would expect.