The dictator Kagame at UN

The dictator Kagame at UN
Dictators like Kagame who have changed their national constitutions to remain indefinitely on power should not be involved in UN high level and global activities including chairing UN meetings

Why has the UN ignored its own report about the massacres of Hutu refugees in DRC ?

The UN has ignored its own reports, NGOs and media reports about the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Hutu in DRC Congo (estimated to be more than 400,000) by Kagame when he attacked Hutu refugee camps in Eastern DRC in 1996. This barbaric killings and human rights violations were perpetrated by Kagame’s RPF with the approval of UK and USA and with sympathetic understanding and knowledge of UNHCR and international NGOs which were operating in the refugees camps. According to the UN, NGO and media reports between 1993 and 2003 women and girls were raped. Men slaughtered. Refugees killed with machetes and sticks. The attacks of refugees also prevented humanitarian organisations to help many other refugees and were forced to die from cholera and other diseases. Other refugees who tried to return to Rwanda where killed on their way by RFI and did not reach their homes. No media, no UNHCR, no NGO were there to witness these massacres. When Kagame plans to kill, he makes sure no NGO and no media are prevent. Kagame always kills at night.

5 Apr 2014

[RwandaLibre] Rwanda's foreign adventures test West's patience

 

Rwanda's foreign adventures test West's patience

BY EDMUND BLAIR AND JENNY CLOVER
KIGALI Sat Apr 5, 2014 8:25am BST


Rwanda's President Paul Kagame addresses the 68th United Nations
General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York, September 25, 2013.
CREDIT: REUTERS/ADAM HUNGER

(Reuters) - Rwandan President Paul Kagame may dress in the sharp suits
of a company CEO, but his language can be more like a drill sergeant
when he grills his cabinet on its performance.

"When you speak I find myself becoming impatient, almost to the point
of being annoyed," the former military intelligence commander publicly
berated a minister last month at an annual meeting of top officials on
modernising the tiny African state.

Western nations offer only modest remonstrations over what they see as
democratic shortcomings in Rwanda, thankful for the oasis of order
that has replaced the genocide they failed to prevent 20 years ago
this month.

But they quietly express concern that Kagame's assertive style at home
is being translated into brazen meddling in a volatile region and
threatening a potential model for Africa.

In 2012, a U.N. report accused Kagame's government of backing a rebel
group in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, prompting the West to
halt some aid; economic growth took a hit.

Now Rwanda is blamed for sending hit squads to assassinate opponents
in South Africa, killing one of two alleged targets.

"It seems to me that they are getting less risk averse," said one
senior Western diplomat, who asked not to be named so he could speak
more openly. "The risk they run is sowing the seed for rupture with
the international community."

Rwanda, which insists the government that has reformed the still
aid-dependent economy is democratically accountable, vigorously denies
both accusations of foreign meddling.

Public comments from Kagame and other officials have done little to
change Western views of Rwanda's complicity, but criticism has
remained muted, and more so with the anniversary of the genocide that
Kagame is credited with ending.

"There is an upswing of international guilt about 1994," the diplomat
said. "There is pressure. I don't think it is increasing and this year
there is a dip."

EXILED OPPONENTS

After exiled former spy chief Patrick Karegeya was found dead in a
Johannesburg hotel in January, Kagame said "traitors" should expect
consequences. A Rwandan website quoted Defence Minister James Kabarebe
saying: "When you choose to be a dog, you die like one."

In March, armed men broke into the Johannesburg home of former Rwandan
army chief General Faustin Kayumba Nyamwasa, another exiled critic.
Nyamwasa, who survived an attempt on his life in South Africa in 2010,
was not in his house at the time.

Diplomats and analysts said the killing and attempted assassination in
short succession showed Kagame feared exiled opponents were trying to
unseat him using links inside Rwanda.

"His number one threat is potential military dissidents in his own
party," said central Africa expert Jason Stearns.

South Africa, a regional superpower, expelled three Rwandan diplomats
over the attacks. Kigali, which said South Africa had produced no
evidence, reciprocated by throwing out six.

The U.S. special envoy to the region, Russ Feingold, said in a brief
statement he was "very concerned about the tension", but was
unavailable for further comment when asked by Reuters.

Rwanda lives in an unstable neighbourhood, next to war-ravaged east
Congo and politically troubled Burundi, which endured decades of
ethnic massacres into the 1990s. Nearby are South Sudan and the
Central African Republic, both mired in conflict.

Behind closed doors Western feathers have been ruffled. Diplomats, who
have described Rwanda's foreign policy as "reckless", worry Kigali
could target opponents in exile in Europe or elsewhere, action that
would draw tougher sanction.

"On the security side, there are more and more countries warning them
off," said another diplomat, He said the private U.S. message was:
"Don't do anything like this in the States."

Critics of Western policy say such warnings are too little, too late.
Rwanda is assertive abroad because the West has not reined in the
president's authoritarian ways at home, they say.

"There hasn't been much reaction to things that happened inside
Rwanda," said Filip Reyntjens, a Rwanda expert and professor at the
University of Antwerp, who says he has been banned from travelling to
Kigali. "That emboldened the regime."

HEALING RIFTS

Rwanda dismisses such criticisms. Shyaka Anastase, head of the Rwandan
Governance Board, a state agency that licences political parties and
assesses everything from civil liberties to corruption, said Rwanda's
system was based on consensus.

That helped Kagame win re-election in 2010 with 93 percent of the
vote, he said, while Western critics were too conditioned by their
politics where parties often win just 40 percent.

"We feel there is a lot of unfairness," he told Reuters, adding
Rwanda's system was healing ethnic, religious and regional rifts which
fuelled the ethnic slaughter in 1994 of 800,000 people, mostly
minority Tutsis but also moderates from the Hutu majority.

Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo denied a Rwandan role in the South
Africa cases but, via Twitter, said Pretoria harboured "dissidents
responsible for terrorist attacks in Rwanda".

Rwandan officials have in the past blamed sporadic grenade attacks,
often fatal, in the capital and elsewhere on exiled and other
opponents. One former presidential bodyguard, who lived in Uganda, is
now on trial in Kigali over involvement in such assaults. Exile
opposition deny any role in such attacks.

When asked for further comment on the South Africa attacks, the
president's office again denied any role and said Rwanda "cannot be
expected to mourn the death of someone actively involved in carrying
out violence against innocent citizens".

It added that talk of "extrajudicial assassinations on foreign soil is
both outlandish and false".

Even as diplomats express private frustrations, public Western
criticism is muted, tempered by genocide guilt and Rwanda's role as an
example for Africa on the efficient use of the West's aid.

Achievements are plain to see. Residents describe jumping over corpses
in the capital in 1994 but now few, if any, African cities can rival
the order and tidiness of Kigali, where small groups of women trim
grass verges on the sides of new roads.

Rwanda is pitching to be a regional financial hub, an idea
unimaginable a few years ago, while the World Bank assesses the tiny
nation of 11 million people as the easiest place to do business in
continental Africa. Ranked No. 32 globally, it is above some European
nations such as its former colonial power Belgium.

www.doingbusiness.org/rankings

It still relies heavily on aid for two-fifths of government spending.
When aid flows stopped in 2012, growth in 2013 tumbled sharply to 4.6
percent, down from the 7 to 8 percent it had averaged in previous
years, even though aid resumed in 2013.

POLITICAL CREDENTIALS

Britain's overseas aid department DFID, one of Rwanda's top
benefactors, talks of "impressive and fast-improving public financial
management system" but notes political restrictions.

To burnish Rwanda's political credentials, Anastase's governance board
now produces a scorecard on issues from rule of law to transparency -
ticking boxes that win allies in the West. Rwanda, says one diplomat,
is "obsessed with indicators".

Swayed in part by visible development, the West also worries about
upsetting the fragile balance maintained by Kagame - president since
2003 and power behind the throne since his Rwandan Patriotic Army
marched into Kigali in 1994 to halt the killings that mainly targeted
Kagame's own Tutsi group.

The government wants to bury the idea of ethnic loyalties, saying
everyone is "Rwandese". But tensions sometimes emerge including during
the "I Am Rwandan" campaign that began last year and which urged Hutus
to apologise for the killings.

"It encourages people to feel guilty because of their ethnicity," said
a middle-aged Hutu, asking not to be named and commenting on the
voluntary countrywide meetings. "But what can you do? We still go
along (with the idea)."

Hutus accept their group is to blame for the genocide, but grumble
that Hutus who were also massacred are often ignored.

Such concerns give Western nations pause. "The worry at the back of
Western minds is you end up with an ethnic bloodbath," said the senior
diplomat. "That is why people in the West are prepared to put up with
the political situation as it is."

Some politicians now talk of changing the constitution to allow Kagame
stand for a third term in 2017. The West murmurs disapproval, while
opponents in Rwanda struggle to be heard.

"We do not have a personal problem with the president but we would not
wish that the constitution is changed," said Frank Habineza, head of
the Democratic Green Party, which registered last year and is the only
party not aligned with the government.

"Kagame is not naturally a democrat," said a regional Western
diplomat. "We just wish he was embracing a little bit more of the
concepts of democracy."

(Writing by Edmund Blair; editing by Philippa Fletcher)

http://www.google.ca/gwt/x?gl=CA&hl=en-CA&u=http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/04/05/uk-rwanda-politics-idUKBREA3406O20140405&q=Rwanda's+foreign+adventures+test+West's+patience&sa=X&ei=-QtAU4-2IKif7AbO1IGQDQ&ved=0CB0QFjAB

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sponsors:

http://www.afriqueintimites.com; http://www.afriqueintimites.com;
http://www.eyumbina.com/; http://www.foraha.net/
-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

The principal key root causes that lead to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 that affected all Rwandan ethnic groups were:

1)The majority Hutu community’s fear of the return of the discriminatory monarchy system that was practiced by the minority Tutsi community against the enslaved majority Hutu community for about 500 years

2)The Hutu community’s fear of Kagame’s guerrilla that committed massacres in the North of the country and other parts of the countries including assassinations of Rwandan politicians.

3) The Rwandan people felt abandoned by the international community ( who was believed to support Kagame’s guerrilla) and then decided to defend themselves with whatever means they had against the advance of Kagame’ guerrilla supported by Ugandan, Tanzanian and Ethiopian armies and other Western powers.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions.

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions. Among Kagame’s rebels who were fighting against the Rwandan government, there were foreigners, mainly Ugandan fighters who were hired to kill and rape innocent Rwandan people in Rwanda and refugees in DRC.

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

SUMMARY : THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE BRITISH BUDGET SUPPORT AND GEO-STRATEGIC AMBITIONS

United Kingdom's Proxy Wars in Africa: The Case of Rwanda and DR Congo:

The Rwandan genocide and 6,000,000 Congolese and Hutu refugees killed are the culminating point of a long UK’s battle to expand their influence to the African Great Lakes Region. UK supported Kagame’s guerrilla war by providing military support and money. The UK refused to intervene in Rwanda during the genocide to allow Kagame to take power by military means that triggered the genocide. Kagame’s fighters and their families were on the Ugandan payroll paid by UK budget support.


· 4 Heads of State assassinated in the francophone African Great Lakes Region.
· 2,000,000 people died in Hutu and Tutsi genocides in Rwanda, Burundi and RD.Congo.
· 600,000 Hutu refugees killed in R.D.Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Rep of Congo.
· 6,000,000 Congolese dead.
· 8,000,000 internal displaced people in Rwanda, Burundi and DR. Congo.
· 500,000 permanent Rwandan and Burundian Hutu refugees, and Congolese refugees around the world.
· English language expansion to Rwanda to replace the French language.
· 20,000 Kagame’s fighters paid salaries from the British Budget Support from 1986 to present.
· £500,000 of British taxpayer’s money paid, so far, to Kagame and his cronies through the budget support, SWAPs, Tutsi-dominated parliament, consultancy, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs.
· Kagame has paid back the British aid received to invade Rwanda and to strengthen his political power by joining the East African Community together with Burundi, joining the Commonwealth, imposing the English Language to Rwandans to replace the French language; helping the British to establish businesses and to access to jobs in Rwanda, and to exploit minerals in D.R.Congo.



Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres

Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres
Kagame killed 200,000 Hutus from all regions of the country, the elderly and children who were left by their relatives, the disabled were burned alive. Other thousands of people were killed in several camps of displaced persons including Kibeho camp. All these war crimes remain unpunished.The British news reporters were accompanying Kagame’s fighters on day-by-day basis and witnessed these massacres, but they never reported on this.

Jobs

Download Documents from Amnesty International

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.

25,000  Hutu bodies  floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.
The British irrational, extremist, partisan,biased, one-sided media and politicians have disregarded Kagame war crimes e.g. the Kibeho camp massacres, massacres of innocents Hutu refugees in DR. Congo. The British media have been supporting Kagame since he invaded Rwanda by organising the propaganda against the French over the Rwandan genocide, suppressing the truth about the genocide and promoting the impunity of Kagame and his cronies in the African Great Lakes Region. For the British, Rwanda does not need democracy, Rwanda is the African Israel; and Kagame and his guerilla fighters are heroes.The extremist British news reporters including Fergal Keane, Chris Simpson, Chris McGreal, Mark Doyle, etc. continue to hate the Hutus communities and to polarise the Rwandan society.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.

Kagame  political  ambitions triggered the genocide.
Kagame’s guerrilla war was aimed at accessing to power at any cost. He rejected all attempts and advice that could stop his military adventures including the cease-fire, political negotiations and cohabitation, and UN peacekeeping interventions. He ignored all warnings that could have helped him to manage the war without tragic consequences. Either you supported Kagame’ s wars and you are now his friend, or you were against his wars and you are his enemy. Therefore, Kagame as the Rwandan strong man now, you have to apologise to him for having been against his war and condemned his war crimes, or accept to be labelled as having been involved in the genocide. All key Kagame’s fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are the ones who hold key positions in Rwandan army and government for the last 15 years. They continue to be supported and advised by the British including Tony Blair, Andrew Mitchell MP, and the British army senior officials.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support  financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.
Genocide propaganda and fabrications are used by the so-called British scholars, news reporters and investigative journalists to promote their CVs and to get income out of the genocide through the selling of their books, providing testimonies against the French, access to consultancy contracts from the UN and Kagame, and participation in conferences and lectures in Rwanda, UK and internationally about genocide. Genocide propaganda has become a lucrative business for Kagame and the British. Anyone who condemned or did not support Kagame’s war is now in jail in Rwanda under the gacaca courts system suuported by British tax payer's money, or his/she is on arrest warrant if he/she managed to flee the Kagame’s regime. Others have fled the country and are still fleeing now. Many others Rwandans are being persecuted in their own country. Kagame is waiting indefinitely for the apologies from other players who warn him or who wanted to help to ensure that political negotiations take place between Kagame and the former government he was fighting against. Britain continues to supply foreign aid to Kagame and his cronies with media reports highlighting economic successes of Rwanda. Such reports are flawed and are aimed at misleading the British public to justify the use of British taxpayers’ money. Kagame and his cronies continue to milk British taxpayers’ money under the British budget support. This started from 1986 through the British budget support to Uganda until now.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the  Rwandan genocide.
No apologies yet to the Rwandan people. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway for Kagame to access power in Rwanda. The British media, politicians, and the so-called British scholars took the role of obstructing the search for the truth and justice; and of denying this assassination on behalf of General Kagame. General Paul Kagame has been obliging the whole world to apologise for his mistakes and war crimes. The UK’s way to apologise has been pumping massive aid into Rwanda's crony government and parliement; and supporting Kagame though media campaigns.

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame
Kagame receives the British massive aid through the budget support, British excessive consultancy, sector wide programmes, the Tutsi-dominated parliament, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs; for political, economic and English language expansion to Rwanda. The British aid to Rwanda is not for all Rwandans. It is for Kagame himself and his Tutsi cronies.

Paul Kagame' actvities as former rebel

Africa

UN News Centre - Africa

The Africa Report - Latest

IRIN - Great Lakes

This blog reports the crimes that remain unpunished and the impunity that has generated a continuous cycle of massacres in many parts of Africa. In many cases, the perpetrators of the crimes seem to have acted in the knowledge that they would not be held to account for their actions.

The need to fight this impunity has become even clearer with the massacres and genocide in many parts of Africa and beyond.

The blog also addresses issues such as Rwanda War Crimes, Rwandan Refugee massacres in Dr Congo, genocide, African leaders’ war crimes and crimes against humanity, Africa war criminals, Africa crimes against humanity, Africa Justice.

-The British relentless and long running battle to become the sole player and gain new grounds of influence in the francophone African Great Lakes Region has led to the expulsion of other traditional players from the region, or strained diplomatic relations between the countries of the region and their traditional friends. These new tensions are even encouraged by the British using a variety of political and economic manoeuvres.

-General Kagame has been echoing the British advice that Rwanda does not need any loan or aid from Rwandan traditional development partners, meaning that British aid is enough to solve all Rwandan problems.

-The British obsession for the English Language expansion has become a tyranny that has led to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, dictatorial regimes, human rights violations, mass killings, destruction of families, communities and cultures, permanent refugees and displaced persons in the African Great Lakes region.


- Rwanda, a country that is run by a corrupt clique of minority-tutsi is governed with institutional discrmination, human rights violations, dictatorship, authoritarianism and autocracy, as everybody would expect.