The dictator Kagame at UN

The dictator Kagame at UN
Dictators like Kagame who have changed their national constitutions to remain indefinitely on power should not be involved in UN high level and global activities including chairing UN meetings

Why has the UN ignored its own report about the massacres of Hutu refugees in DRC ?

The UN has ignored its own reports, NGOs and media reports about the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Hutu in DRC Congo (estimated to be more than 400,000) by Kagame when he attacked Hutu refugee camps in Eastern DRC in 1996. This barbaric killings and human rights violations were perpetrated by Kagame’s RPF with the approval of UK and USA and with sympathetic understanding and knowledge of UNHCR and international NGOs which were operating in the refugees camps. According to the UN, NGO and media reports between 1993 and 2003 women and girls were raped. Men slaughtered. Refugees killed with machetes and sticks. The attacks of refugees also prevented humanitarian organisations to help many other refugees and were forced to die from cholera and other diseases. Other refugees who tried to return to Rwanda where killed on their way by RFI and did not reach their homes. No media, no UNHCR, no NGO were there to witness these massacres. When Kagame plans to kill, he makes sure no NGO and no media are prevent. Kagame always kills at night.

15 Oct 2014

Dutch pushing for Rwandan extradition: ready or not? | Radio Netherlands Worldwide

More about:

The Netherlands is lobbying the European Court of Human Rights to allow the extradition of genocide suspects living in Europe to Rwanda, International Justice Tribune has learned.

By Mark Schenkel, Amsterdam

Officially the Dutch government does not consider the Rwandan legal system fit for extraditions. Human rights organizations and Dutch legal experts, asked for their reaction, criticise the Dutch initiative at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. Rwanda does not yet have a judiciary that is fully independent, they say.

RELATED CONTENT

"In theory, Rwanda is reforming its judiciary, but in practice those measures are still insufficient'', said Carina Tertsakian from Human Rights Watch. Amnesty International and the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) are also surprised by the Dutch government's initiative. Rwanda-expert Frederick Cowell: "In Rwanda, politicized processes still take place, without adequate rights for suspects.''

According to the Dutch ministries of Foreign Affairs and Security & Justice, extraditions are not to be considered until Rwanda provides "the necessary guarantees'' for independent legal procedures, regardless of a positive decision by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). A possible extradition treaty has to be voted on first by Dutch parliament.

Debate on the issue began when The Netherlands became involved in a legal case currently being considered by the ECHR. Its judges will have to decide whether or not to allow the extradition to Rwanda of Sylvère Ahorugeze, who is wanted for genocide and crimes against humanity. Ahorugeze, the former head of the Rwandan civil aviation authority, is suspected of having killed twenty-eight Tutsis in April 1994 in the Rwandan capital Kigali. He denies the charges.

Ahorugeze was arrested in July 2008 in Stockholm and the Swedish government decided he could be extradited to Rwanda. Ahorugeze's lawyer is challenging this decision at the ECHR, but it is unclear when the court will give a ruling.

Dutch advice
The Netherlands is putting its weight behind the Swedish opinion that the extradition should go ahead, despite its criticism of Rwanda's legal system and the official Dutch position that Rwanda is not ready for extraditions. The International Justice Tribune has come into the possession of the written intervention of the Dutch representative at the ECHR, dated July 27th 2010. She writes, Rwanda has, "over the years (made) substantial and fundamental progress in furthering the rule of law''. Since the mass killings of 1994, Rwanda has – through Dutch financial support – built new court houses and the "state-of-the-art-prison "Mpanga", and has trained judges. Among the "most relevant developments'' are the abolition of the death penalty and of life imprisonment in isolation.

Extradition floodgates
If the ECHR approves extradition, a flow of genocide suspects living in Europe could begin. Many of these people received asylum status after 1994 but in recent years suspicions have been mounting about the involvement of some in the 1994 events. Still, to this day not a single suspect has been extradited. Judges, including in Germany, France, Great Britain and Finland, have always blocked extraditions in appeal cases. Critics argue that in Sweden it was not the judiciary that decided to extradite Ahorugeze, but the government.

Larissa van den Herik is professor of Public International Law at Leiden University. She presumes that The Hague believes it will be useful if the ECHR has already cleared all legal obstacles, ready for when the Netherlands reaches a bilateral extradition treaty with Rwanda at a later date. In addition to that she believes political motives are in play, "The Netherlands is a driving force behind the reforms in the Rwandan legal system. If the ECHR approves extradition, that will also be seized on as confirmation of Dutch policy. The Dutch authorities clearly have an agenda.''

Law not politics
The departments of Foreign Affairs and Security & Justice deny that the Netherlands is lobbying the ECHR because of political reasons. The Hague argues it is promoting extradition on a European level merely to draw attention to the positive effects of Dutch investments in the Rwandan legal system. "If the ECHR disapproves of extradition, that will also be a valuable verdict. Such a verdict (…) will refine the insight of the areas on which Rwanda still needs assistance to reach the level required by Europe.''

Roelof Haveman, a Dutch legal consultant, believes Rwanda is ready to handle extradition cases. Haveman assisted the Rwandan government in setting up a training institute for the judiciary. He points out that in June this year the Rwanda-tribunal handed over the case of Jean Uwinkindi to Kigali, the first time this has happened.

Critics argue that the Netherlands already encouraged the ECHR last year to allow extradition, well before the Rwanda-tribunal handed over the Uwinkindi-case. "But back then it was clear already that the Rwandan legal system was moving in the right direction'', Haveman said.

Haveman points out how aware Rwanda is of the outside world's watchful eyes on its proceedings. "Kigali realises that any genocide case will be closely followed and therefore needs to be flawless. Otherwise, European countries might put a hold on further extraditions.'' Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International and the CHRI do not share Havemans opinion.

They point to the case against Victoire Ingabire, the opposition leader who is on trial in Rwanda for alleged ties to a terrorist organisation. The case of Ingabire is high profile, but nevertheless president Paul Kagame has publicly stated that Victoire Ingabire belongs behind bars. A fair trial is therefore impossible say critics, improved judiciary in Rwanda or not.

Bookmark/Search this post with: 
  • Delicious
    •  
  • Digg
    •  
  • StumbleUpon
    •  
  • Reddit
    •  
  • Facebook
    •  
  • Google
    •  
  • Technorati


at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

The principal key root causes that lead to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 that affected all Rwandan ethnic groups were:

1)The majority Hutu community’s fear of the return of the discriminatory monarchy system that was practiced by the minority Tutsi community against the enslaved majority Hutu community for about 500 years

2)The Hutu community’s fear of Kagame’s guerrilla that committed massacres in the North of the country and other parts of the countries including assassinations of Rwandan politicians.

3) The Rwandan people felt abandoned by the international community ( who was believed to support Kagame’s guerrilla) and then decided to defend themselves with whatever means they had against the advance of Kagame’ guerrilla supported by Ugandan, Tanzanian and Ethiopian armies and other Western powers.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions.

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions. Among Kagame’s rebels who were fighting against the Rwandan government, there were foreigners, mainly Ugandan fighters who were hired to kill and rape innocent Rwandan people in Rwanda and refugees in DRC.

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

SUMMARY : THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE BRITISH BUDGET SUPPORT AND GEO-STRATEGIC AMBITIONS

United Kingdom's Proxy Wars in Africa: The Case of Rwanda and DR Congo:

The Rwandan genocide and 6,000,000 Congolese and Hutu refugees killed are the culminating point of a long UK’s battle to expand their influence to the African Great Lakes Region. UK supported Kagame’s guerrilla war by providing military support and money. The UK refused to intervene in Rwanda during the genocide to allow Kagame to take power by military means that triggered the genocide. Kagame’s fighters and their families were on the Ugandan payroll paid by UK budget support.


· 4 Heads of State assassinated in the francophone African Great Lakes Region.
· 2,000,000 people died in Hutu and Tutsi genocides in Rwanda, Burundi and RD.Congo.
· 600,000 Hutu refugees killed in R.D.Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Rep of Congo.
· 6,000,000 Congolese dead.
· 8,000,000 internal displaced people in Rwanda, Burundi and DR. Congo.
· 500,000 permanent Rwandan and Burundian Hutu refugees, and Congolese refugees around the world.
· English language expansion to Rwanda to replace the French language.
· 20,000 Kagame’s fighters paid salaries from the British Budget Support from 1986 to present.
· £500,000 of British taxpayer’s money paid, so far, to Kagame and his cronies through the budget support, SWAPs, Tutsi-dominated parliament, consultancy, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs.
· Kagame has paid back the British aid received to invade Rwanda and to strengthen his political power by joining the East African Community together with Burundi, joining the Commonwealth, imposing the English Language to Rwandans to replace the French language; helping the British to establish businesses and to access to jobs in Rwanda, and to exploit minerals in D.R.Congo.


Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres

Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres
Kagame killed 200,000 Hutus from all regions of the country, the elderly and children who were left by their relatives, the disabled were burned alive. Other thousands of people were killed in several camps of displaced persons including Kibeho camp. All these war crimes remain unpunished.The British news reporters were accompanying Kagame’s fighters on day-by-day basis and witnessed these massacres, but they never reported on this.

Jobs

Loading...

Download Documents from Amnesty International

Loading...

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.
The British irrational, extremist, partisan,biased, one-sided media and politicians have disregarded Kagame war crimes e.g. the Kibeho camp massacres, massacres of innocents Hutu refugees in DR. Congo. The British media have been supporting Kagame since he invaded Rwanda by organising the propaganda against the French over the Rwandan genocide, suppressing the truth about the genocide and promoting the impunity of Kagame and his cronies in the African Great Lakes Region. For the British, Rwanda does not need democracy, Rwanda is the African Israel; and Kagame and his guerilla fighters are heroes.The extremist British news reporters including Fergal Keane, Chris Simpson, Chris McGreal, Mark Doyle, etc. continue to hate the Hutus communities and to polarise the Rwandan society.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.
Kagame’s guerrilla war was aimed at accessing to power at any cost. He rejected all attempts and advice that could stop his military adventures including the cease-fire, political negotiations and cohabitation, and UN peacekeeping interventions. He ignored all warnings that could have helped him to manage the war without tragic consequences. Either you supported Kagame’ s wars and you are now his friend, or you were against his wars and you are his enemy. Therefore, Kagame as the Rwandan strong man now, you have to apologise to him for having been against his war and condemned his war crimes, or accept to be labelled as having been involved in the genocide. All key Kagame’s fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are the ones who hold key positions in Rwandan army and government for the last 15 years. They continue to be supported and advised by the British including Tony Blair, Andrew Mitchell MP, and the British army senior officials.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.
Genocide propaganda and fabrications are used by the so-called British scholars, news reporters and investigative journalists to promote their CVs and to get income out of the genocide through the selling of their books, providing testimonies against the French, access to consultancy contracts from the UN and Kagame, and participation in conferences and lectures in Rwanda, UK and internationally about genocide. Genocide propaganda has become a lucrative business for Kagame and the British. Anyone who condemned or did not support Kagame’s war is now in jail in Rwanda under the gacaca courts system suuported by British tax payer's money, or his/she is on arrest warrant if he/she managed to flee the Kagame’s regime. Others have fled the country and are still fleeing now. Many others Rwandans are being persecuted in their own country. Kagame is waiting indefinitely for the apologies from other players who warn him or who wanted to help to ensure that political negotiations take place between Kagame and the former government he was fighting against. Britain continues to supply foreign aid to Kagame and his cronies with media reports highlighting economic successes of Rwanda. Such reports are flawed and are aimed at misleading the British public to justify the use of British taxpayers’ money. Kagame and his cronies continue to milk British taxpayers’ money under the British budget support. This started from 1986 through the British budget support to Uganda until now.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.
No apologies yet to the Rwandan people. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway for Kagame to access power in Rwanda. The British media, politicians, and the so-called British scholars took the role of obstructing the search for the truth and justice; and of denying this assassination on behalf of General Kagame. General Paul Kagame has been obliging the whole world to apologise for his mistakes and war crimes. The UK’s way to apologise has been pumping massive aid into Rwanda's crony government and parliement; and supporting Kagame though media campaigns.

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame
Kagame receives the British massive aid through the budget support, British excessive consultancy, sector wide programmes, the Tutsi-dominated parliament, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs; for political, economic and English language expansion to Rwanda. The British aid to Rwanda is not for all Rwandans. It is for Kagame himself and his Tutsi cronies.

Paul Kagame' actvities as former rebel

Africa

Loading...

UN News Centre - Africa

Loading...

The Africa Report - Latest

Loading...

IRIN - Great Lakes

Loading...

This blog reports the crimes that remain unpunished and the impunity that has generated a continuous cycle of massacres in many parts of Africa. In many cases, the perpetrators of the crimes seem to have acted in the knowledge that they would not be held to account for their actions.

The need to fight this impunity has become even clearer with the massacres and genocide in many parts of Africa and beyond.

The blog also addresses issues such as Rwanda War Crimes, Rwandan Refugee massacres in Dr Congo, genocide, African leaders’ war crimes and crimes against humanity, Africa war criminals, Africa crimes against humanity, Africa Justice.

-The British relentless and long running battle to become the sole player and gain new grounds of influence in the francophone African Great Lakes Region has led to the expulsion of other traditional players from the region, or strained diplomatic relations between the countries of the region and their traditional friends. These new tensions are even encouraged by the British using a variety of political and economic manoeuvres.

-General Kagame has been echoing the British advice that Rwanda does not need any loan or aid from Rwandan traditional development partners, meaning that British aid is enough to solve all Rwandan problems.

-The British obsession for the English Language expansion has become a tyranny that has led to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, dictatorial regimes, human rights violations, mass killings, destruction of families, communities and cultures, permanent refugees and displaced persons in the African Great Lakes region.

- Rwanda, a country that is run by a corrupt clique of minority-tutsi is governed with institutional discrmination, human rights violations, dictatorship, authoritarianism and autocracy, as everybody would expect.