News and Information about Africa issues and problems, Human Rights Abuses, Unpunished War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity in Africa, UK's Policy in Africa and UK-Africa Politics and Foreign Relations, e.g. UK's Proxy Wars in Africa: The Case of Rwanda and D.R. Congo.
Dictators like Kagame who have changed their national constitutions to remain indefinitely on power should not be involved in UN high level and global activities including chairing UN meetings
Why has the UN ignored its own report about the massacres of Hutu refugees in DRC ?
The UN has ignored its own reports, NGOs and media reports about the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Hutu in DRC Congo (estimated to be more than 400,000) by Kagame when he attacked Hutu refugee camps in Eastern DRC in 1996. This barbaric killings and human rights violations were perpetrated by Kagame’s RPF with the approval of UK and USA and with sympathetic understanding and knowledge of UNHCR and international NGOs which were operating in the refugees camps. According to the UN, NGO and media reports between 1993 and 2003 women and girls were raped. Men slaughtered. Refugees killed with machetes and sticks. The attacks of refugees also prevented humanitarian organisations to help many other refugees and were forced to die from cholera and other diseases. Other refugees who tried to return to Rwanda where killed on their way by RFI and did not reach their homes. No media, no UNHCR, no NGO were there to witness these massacres. When Kagame plans to kill, he makes sure no NGO and no media are prevent. Kagame always kills at night.
3 Jun 2014
FW: [RwandaLibre] Inside the UN Security Council: April-July 1994. United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Czech Republic Declassified Documents Reveal New Perspectives on United Nations Security Council Debates on Rwanda in April 1994
Oooh, que le Rwanda pourrait renaitre avec un vrai espoir, si nos amis aveugles par une propagande outree de ceux qui cachent leur responsabilite dans le desastre rwandais 1994 pouvaient rouvrir les yeux, et ensuite rejeter l'egoisme insatiable, l'orgueil insense et les mensonges ehontes avec quoi ils blessent inutilement d'autres ethnies!
Ainsi, l'Inyabutatu (hutu, tutsi et twa) pourrait travailler ensemble et en confiance pour attraper rapidement les vrais fossoyeurs des rwandais et les obliger a financer la reconstruction harmonieuse et durable du Rwanda. Ceux qui vivent au pays cesseraient alors de recevoir les compensations dissimulees en aides humanitaires avec lesquelles les "faux" bons disent assistes les miserables par pitie!
Oui, inexorablement le temps applanit tout; meme celui qui a couche avec sa mere dans la tombe finit par etre connu!
To: sibomanaxyz999@gmail.com From: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 11:34:53 -0400 Subject: [RwandaLibre] Inside the UN Security Council: April-July 1994. United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Czech Republic Declassified Documents Reveal New Perspectives on United Nations Security Council Debates on Rwanda in April 1994
The Security Council votes to extend the mandate of the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) until 29 July 1994. Date: 05 April 1994. Courtesy of United Nations, New York Photo #286894.
Inside the UN Security Council: April–July 1994
United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Czech Republic Declassified Documents Reveal New Perspectives on United Nations Security Council Debates on Rwanda in April 1994
National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 472
June 2, 2014
Edited by Michael Dobbs For more information contact: 202/994-7000 or nsarchiv@gwu.edu
Washington, DC, June 2, 2014 – Newly-declassified reporting from 1994 by key members of the United Nations Security Council provides a previously unavailable day-by-day narrative of the international response to the Rwandan genocide, including the fateful decision to withdraw UN peacekeepers from the country at the height of the killing. The National Security Archive at The George Washington University and the Center for the Prevention of Genocide at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum are publishing a selection of the revealing cables on their Web sites today and tomorrow. The posting is the eighth in a series by the "#Rwanda20yrs" project, a partnership between the Archive and the Center to mark the twentieth anniversary of the genocide in Rwanda. The diplomatic cables, which supplement previously released United States and United Nations telegrams, show that non-aligned states led by Nigeria attempted to strengthen the UN peacekeeping force, known as UNAMIR, but failed to provide the required resources. The United States and other permanent members of the Security Council were scarred by the murders of UN peacekeepers in both Rwanda and Somalia, and unwilling to take any action that might prove unpopular domestically. Declassification requests from the National Security Archive and the Center for the Prevention of Genocide in four countries have resulted in the release of nearly 300 formerly secret diplomatic cables that provide fresh insights into the closed Security Council sessions. The newly-released documents include reporting from the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and the Czech Republic, which were key players in the Security Council debates, in addition to previously withheld US diplomatic traffic. While the State Department has released thousands of documents about the Rwanda genocide, thousands more are still considered confidential by other US government agencies, notably the Department of Defense. The Clinton Library has yet to process a request for the release of more than 100 emails and internal White House memoranda that could shed light on the role played by Clinton aides, including the present national security adviser, Susan Rice, in the UNAMIR withdrawal decision. The request is supported by the Public Interest Declassification Board, an advisory committee established by Congress in 2000, to promote "the fullest possible public access" to significant U.S. national security decisions.
Ambassador Jean Damascene Bizimana (Rwanda) addresses members of the Security Council. Date: 08 June 1994. Courtesy of United Nations, New York, Photo #286758.
Today's posting features a number of less well-known but influential characters in the West's developing response to the crisis. The New Zealand envoy, Colin Keating, served as President of the Security Council in April 1994, at the height of the genocide. The British ambassador, Sir David Hannay, was known as the "King of the Security Council" because of his mastery of UN procedures. Karel Kovanda of the Czech Republic was the first UN ambassador to use the term "genocide" to describe events in Rwanda. The United States representative on the Security Council was a much more familiar figure — Madeleine Albright, who went on to serve as Secretary of State in the second Clinton administration. The contemporaneous diplomatic cables offer valuable insights into the debates in the so-called "Informal Sessions" of the Security Council which took place behind closed doors, without official note-takers present. It was at these meetings that the international community shaped its response to the Rwanda genocide in the days and weeks after the assassination of Rwandan president Juvenal Habyarimana on April 6. Details that emerge from the newly-released cables include the following:
Threats by the Clinton administration to withdraw peacekeepers from Rwanda, even before April 6. The day before the shooting down of the presidential plane, Washington linked a three-month extension of UNAMIR [Document 2] to progress on implementing the Arusha peace agreements. According to Keating, the U.S. wanted to keep Rwanda on "a short leash" [Document 1] as a means of bringing pressure on the warring parties to meet their obligations under the peace accords.
Report by Colin Keating, New Zealand representative to the UN, Document 1.
The decision by US policy-makers to push for withdrawal of UNAMIR. On April 11, four days after the start of the genocide, Keating reported "a growing feeling" on the part of US diplomats that UNAMIR "withdrawal may be necessary." [Document 4] On April 12, U.S. ambassador Madeleine Albright cabled Washington [Document 5] to propose "taking the lead in the Security Council to authorize the evacuation of the bulk of UNAMIR while leaving behind a skeletal staff." Albright reported a closing "window of opportunity" to withdraw the peacekeepers while Kigali airport "is still open and under French-Belgian control."
Conflicting signals from the UN Secretary-General. On April 13, Boutros Boutros-Ghali informed his aides that "UNAMIR will have to be withdrawn" [Document 8] in light of a decision by the Belgian government to pull out its peacekeepers. The following day, he changed his position, and suggested that UNAMIR should stay on without the Belgians. On May 2, according to a cable from Keating, he "sprang a surprise" [Document 15] and proposed that the Council authorize "more forceful action to restore order in Rwanda."
Opposition to the presence of foreign forces by the Tutsi-led Rwandan Patriotic Front. The RPF accepted the existing UN presence in Kigali, but was deeply suspicious of French and Belgian forces deployed in Rwanda to evacuate foreigners. The RPF threatened to treat such forces as "hostile" [Document 3] unless they withdrew from the country by April 14 at the latest. [Document 6]
Report by Sir David Hannay of the UK, Document 12.
Frustration of non-permanent members with the lack of action by the Security Council. As the scale of the killings became apparent on April 20, UNSC President Keating observed that continued silence on the part of the Council was "becoming increasingly difficult to explain." [Document 9] Keating's successor, Ibrahim Gambari of Nigeria, warned on May 5 that the Council risked becoming "a laughing stock" [Document 16] unless it took prompt action.
Role played by NGOs. Security Council members relied on non-governmental organizations for some of the best reporting on Rwanda. An April 25 briefing by the French humanitarian group Medecins Sans Frontieres that "a clear policy of genocide" [Document 11] was being conducted by "Rwandan government forces" made a deep impression on Keating and other Council members. As a consequence of the MSF report, Kovanda informed Prague that a "clear genocide" [Document 10] was taking place in Rwanda. The Czech envoy ridiculed Rwandan government-RPF ceasefire negotiations under UN auspices as comparable to "persuading Hitler to reach a ceasefire with the Jews."
Report by the Czech Republic's Karel Kovanda, Document 10.
Obstruction by the Rwandan government. The Security Council deliberations were complicated by the presence of a representative of the genocidal regime in Rwanda, Jean-Damascene Bizimana. According to Hannay, the Rwandan envoy persuaded other non-aligned ambassadors [Document 14] to block use of the word "genocide" to describe events in Rwanda on April 30. A handwritten annotation on the presidential statement drafted by Ambassador Keating records that "Rwanda/NAM wouldn't allow the term genocide." [Document 13]
Opposition to French peacekeeping force. Many ambassadors were opposed to the French intervention known as "Operation Turquoise." According to Keating, Hannay privately described the French proposal as "crazy" [Document 17] while US diplomats termed it "disastrous." Nevertheless the Security Council voted 10-0 with five abstentions [Document 18] (New Zealand, Nigeria, Brazil, Pakistan, and China) on June 22 to support the operation.
The US Deputy Assistant Secretary for African Affairs, Ambassador Prudence Bushnell, speaks on the internal US government discussions on the decision to withdraw UNAMIR.
See the annotated table and index below for the full collection of released reports from the UN Security Council informal meetings from January 1994 to July 1994. * The sources of these documents include freedom of information requests to the US, UK, and New Zealand governments, the Czech Republic Foreign Ministry, as well as evidence from the International Criminal Tribunal in Rwanda (ICTR).
The Documents
Document 1 Date: April 4, 1994 To: Wellington [New Zealand] From: Washington [New Zealand Embassy] Subject: Security Council: New Zealand Presidency: Rwanda Cable No: C02734 Document 2 Date: April 6, 1994 To: FCO [Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK] From: UKMIS New York [UK Mission to the UN] Subject: Rwanda Cable No: 1216 Document 3 Date: April 8, 1994 To: Wellington [New Zealand] From: New York [New Zealand Mission to the UN] Subject: Security Council: Rwanda Cable No: C04272 Document 4 Date: April 11, 1994 To: Wellington [New Zealand] From: Washington [New Zealand Embassy] Subject: Security Council: Rwanda: US Views Cable No: C02755 Document 5 Date: April 12, 1994 To: SecState WashDC [Secretary of State, Washington, DC] From: US Mission, USUN, New York Subject: Future UNAMIR and French Roles in Rwanda Cable No: USUN 01503 Document 6 Date: April 13, 1994 To: FCO [Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK] From: UKMIS New York [UK Mission to the UN] Subject: Rwanda Cable No: 1306 Document 7 Date: April 13, 1994 To: [Kofi] Annan [Undersecretary General for Peacekeeping Operations] From: [Chinmaya] Gharekhan [Security Council Representative of the UN Secretary-General] Subject: [Belgian Foreign Minister Informs Secretary General of Belgian Pullout from UNAMIR] Cable No: N/A Document 8 Date: April 15, 1994 To: FCO [Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK] From: UKMIS New York [UK Mission to the UN] Subject: Rwanda Cable No: 1364 Document 9 Date: April 20, 1994 To: Wellington [New Zealand] From: New York [New Zealand Mission to the UN] Subject: Security Council: Rwanda Cable No: C04348 Document 10 Date: April 25, 1994 To: [Czech Foreign Ministry, Prague] From: [Czech Republic Mission to the UN, New York] Subject: N/A Cable No: 2657 Document 11 Date: April 25, 1994 To: Wellington [New Zealand] From: New York [New Zealand Mission to the UN] Subject: Security Council: Rwanda Cable No: C04362 Document 12 Date: April 26, 1994 To: FCO [Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK] From: UKMIS New York [UK Mission to the UN] Subject: Rwanda Cable No: 1481 Document 13 Date: April 30, 1994 To: Wellington [New Zealand] From: New York [New Zealand Mission to the UN] Subject: Security Council: Rwanda Cable No: N/A Document 14 Date: April 30, 1994 To: FCO [Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK] From: UKMIS New York [UK Mission to the UN] Subject: Rwanda Cable No: 1559 Document 15 Date: May 2, 1994 To: Wellington [New Zealand] From: New York [New Zealand Mission to the UN] Subject: Security Council: Rwanda Cable No: C04400 Document 16 Date: May 5, 1994 To: The Secretary-General [Boutros Boutros-Ghali], Geneva From: [Chinmaya] Gharekhan [Security Council Representative of the UN Secretary-General], UNations New York Subject: [Security Council Discussion on Rwanda] Cable No: 1451 Document 17 Date: June 17, 1994 To: Wellington [New Zealand] From: New York [New Zealand Mission to the UN] Subject: Security Council: Rwanda Cable No: C04641 Document 18 Date: June 22, 1994 To: Wellington [New Zealand] From: New York [New Zealand Mission to the UN] Subject: Security Council: Rwanda Cable No: C04656
U.N.S.C. Readouts
Sort by: Session Date Source Author Document Date Show Documents From: Czech Republic New Zealand Rwandan Patriotic Front United Kingdom United Nations United States Note: Some documents are listed twice if they reference more than one Security Council session. When subjects are absent or not descriptive, brief summaries are sometimes given in brackets in the "Subject" field.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- .To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to: RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com _____________________________________________________
More news: http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -SVP, considérer environnement avant toute impression de cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes. ====== -Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”
The principal key root causes that lead to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 that affected all Rwandan ethnic groups were:
1)The majority Hutu community’s fear of the return of the discriminatory monarchy system that was practiced by the minority Tutsi community against the enslaved majority Hutu community for about 500 years
2)The Hutu community’s fear of Kagame’s guerrilla that committed massacres in the North of the country and other parts of the countries including assassinations of Rwandan politicians.
3) The Rwandan people felt abandoned by the international community ( who was believed to support Kagame’s guerrilla) and then decided to defend themselves with whatever means they had against the advance of Kagame’ guerrilla supported by Ugandan, Tanzanian and Ethiopian armies and other Western powers.
-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”
-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”
-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”
-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”
The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions.
The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions. Among Kagame’s rebels who were fighting against the Rwandan government, there were foreigners, mainly Ugandan fighters who were hired to kill and rape innocent Rwandan people in Rwanda and refugees in DRC.
SUMMARY : THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE BRITISH BUDGET SUPPORT AND GEO-STRATEGIC AMBITIONS
United Kingdom's Proxy Wars in Africa: The Case of Rwanda and DR Congo: The Rwandan genocide and 6,000,000 Congolese and Hutu refugees killed are the culminating point of a long UK’s battle to expand their influence to the African Great Lakes Region. UK supported Kagame’s guerrilla war by providing military support and money. The UK refused to intervene in Rwanda during the genocide to allow Kagame to take power by military means that triggered the genocide. Kagame’s fighters and their families were on the Ugandan payroll paid by UK budget support. · 4 Heads of State assassinated in the francophone African Great Lakes Region. · 2,000,000 people died in Hutu and Tutsi genocides in Rwanda, Burundi and RD.Congo. · 600,000 Hutu refugees killed in R.D.Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Rep of Congo. · 6,000,000 Congolese dead. · 8,000,000 internal displaced people in Rwanda, Burundi and DR. Congo. · 500,000 permanent Rwandan and Burundian Hutu refugees, and Congolese refugees around the world. · English language expansion to Rwanda to replace the French language. · 20,000 Kagame’s fighters paid salaries from the British Budget Support from 1986 to present. · £500,000 of British taxpayer’s money paid, so far, to Kagame and his cronies through the budget support, SWAPs, Tutsi-dominated parliament, consultancy, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs. · Kagame has paid back the British aid received to invade Rwanda and to strengthen his political power by joining the East African Community together with Burundi, joining the Commonwealth, imposing the English Language to Rwandans to replace the French language; helping the British to establish businesses and to access to jobs in Rwanda, and to exploit minerals in D.R.Congo.
Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres
Kagame killed 200,000 Hutus from all regions of the country, the elderly and children who were left by their relatives, the disabled were burned alive. Other thousands of people were killed in several camps of displaced persons including Kibeho camp. All these war crimes remain unpunished.The British news reporters were accompanying Kagame’s fighters on day-by-day basis and witnessed these massacres, but they never reported on this.
25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.
The British irrational, extremist, partisan,biased, one-sided media and politicians have disregarded Kagame war crimes e.g. the Kibeho camp massacres, massacres of innocents Hutu refugees in DR. Congo. The British media have been supporting Kagame since he invaded Rwanda by organising the propaganda against the French over the Rwandan genocide, suppressing the truth about the genocide and promoting the impunity of Kagame and his cronies in the African Great Lakes Region. For the British, Rwanda does not need democracy, Rwanda is the African Israel; and Kagame and his guerilla fighters are heroes.The extremist British news reporters including Fergal Keane, Chris Simpson, Chris McGreal, Mark Doyle, etc. continue to hate the Hutus communities and to polarise the Rwandan society.
Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.
Kagame’s guerrilla war was aimed at accessing to power at any cost. He rejected all attempts and advice that could stop his military adventures including the cease-fire, political negotiations and cohabitation, and UN peacekeeping interventions. He ignored all warnings that could have helped him to manage the war without tragic consequences. Either you supported Kagame’ s wars and you are now his friend, or you were against his wars and you are his enemy. Therefore, Kagame as the Rwandan strong man now, you have to apologise to him for having been against his war and condemned his war crimes, or accept to be labelled as having been involved in the genocide. All key Kagame’s fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are the ones who hold key positions in Rwandan army and government for the last 15 years. They continue to be supported and advised by the British including Tony Blair, Andrew Mitchell MP, and the British army senior officials.
Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.
Genocide propaganda and fabrications are used by the so-called British scholars, news reporters and investigative journalists to promote their CVs and to get income out of the genocide through the selling of their books, providing testimonies against the French, access to consultancy contracts from the UN and Kagame, and participation in conferences and lectures in Rwanda, UK and internationally about genocide. Genocide propaganda has become a lucrative business for Kagame and the British. Anyone who condemned or did not support Kagame’s war is now in jail in Rwanda under the gacaca courts system suuported by British tax payer's money, or his/she is on arrest warrant if he/she managed to flee the Kagame’s regime. Others have fled the country and are still fleeing now. Many others Rwandans are being persecuted in their own country. Kagame is waiting indefinitely for the apologies from other players who warn him or who wanted to help to ensure that political negotiations take place between Kagame and the former government he was fighting against. Britain continues to supply foreign aid to Kagame and his cronies with media reports highlighting economic successes of Rwanda. Such reports are flawed and are aimed at misleading the British public to justify the use of British taxpayers’ money. Kagame and his cronies continue to milk British taxpayers’ money under the British budget support. This started from 1986 through the British budget support to Uganda until now.
Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.
No apologies yet to the Rwandan people. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway for Kagame to access power in Rwanda. The British media, politicians, and the so-called British scholars took the role of obstructing the search for the truth and justice; and of denying this assassination on behalf of General Kagame. General Paul Kagame has been obliging the whole world to apologise for his mistakes and war crimes. The UK’s way to apologise has been pumping massive aid into Rwanda's crony government and parliement; and supporting Kagame though media campaigns.
Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame
Kagame receives the British massive aid through the budget support, British excessive consultancy, sector wide programmes, the Tutsi-dominated parliament, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs; for political, economic and English language expansion to Rwanda. The British aid to Rwanda is not for all Rwandans. It is for Kagame himself and his Tutsi cronies.
This blog reports the crimes that remain unpunished and the impunity that has generated a continuous cycle of massacres in many parts of Africa. In many cases, the perpetrators of the crimes seem to have acted in the knowledge that they would not be held to account for their actions.
The need to fight this impunity has become even clearer with the massacres and genocide in many parts of Africa and beyond.
The blog also addresses issues such as Rwanda War Crimes, Rwandan Refugee massacres in Dr Congo,genocide, African leaders’ war crimes and crimes against humanity, Africa war criminals, Africa crimes against humanity, Africa Justice.
-The British relentless and long running battle to become the sole player and gain new grounds of influence in the francophone African Great Lakes Region has led to the expulsion of other traditional players from the region, or strained diplomatic relations between the countries of the region and their traditional friends. These new tensions are even encouraged by the British using a variety of political and economic manoeuvres.
-General Kagame has been echoing the British advice that Rwanda does not need any loan or aid from Rwandan traditional development partners, meaning that British aid is enough to solve all Rwandan problems.
-The British obsession for the English Language expansion has become a tyranny that has led to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, dictatorial regimes, human rights violations, mass killings, destruction of families, communities and cultures, permanent refugees and displaced persons in the African Great Lakes region.
- Rwanda, a country that is run by a corrupt clique of minority-tutsi is governed with institutional discrmination, human rights violations, dictatorship, authoritarianism and autocracy, as everybody would expect.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.