Revealed: British companies trading in conflict minerals from DR Congo
"Faced with a gun, what can you do?"
War and the militarization of mining in Eastern Congo
UK government accused of hypocrisy for failing to act
This message from: Global Witness, Tuesday 21 July, 2009 http://www.globalwitness.org/index.php
Download the full report: FacedWithWGun.pdf <http://www.ncadc.org.uk/Newszine108/FacedWithWGun.pdf> ~ 3.8MB
British companies Afrimex and Amalgamated Metals Corporation (AMC) are among those named in a new report published today by campaign group Global Witness as buying minerals that are funding armed groups and fuelling the 12-year conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Several million people have died and many more have been displaced as a result of the conflict.
The British government knows about the trading links between the companies and the warring parties but has failed to act. In 2008, Afrimex, a small trading company based in Middlesex, was found by the government to be in breach of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises for buying from suppliers who made payments to a rebel group. Afrimex continued to trade in minerals throughout the course of the investigation, including with at least one of the same suppliers, but the UK government has yet to take any concrete action to ensure that these practices have stopped.
AMC, headquartered in Bishopsgate, London, is the parent company of Thailand-based THAISARCO, the world's fifth-largest tin-producing company. THAISARCO's main supplier, Congo-based Panju, sells minerals from mines controlled by the main rebel group, the FDLR, who are guilty of appalling human rights abuses, including rape and mass killings. Among the main shareholders of AMC are Victor Herman Sher, Geoffrey Charles Leacroft Rowan and Giles Robbins, all of whom appeared on the Sunday Times Rich List in 2009 and 2008.
"The British government is the largest bilateral aid donor to the DRC and a key diplomatic player. Its failure to hold British companies to account is undermining its own efforts and allowing one of the main drivers of the conflict to continue unchecked," said Patrick Alley, Director of Global Witness. "We have asked the government countless times to pay more attention to the role of minerals in fuelling the conflict, and yet it seems that they are more concerned with protecting their companies' economic interests."
The 110-page report, 'Faced with a gun, what can you do?', details how many mining areas in eastern DRC are controlled by rebels and the national army, who violently exploit civilians to retain access to valuable minerals; these include cassiterite (tin ore), coltan and gold. Cassiterite and coltan are used to make mobile phones and computers, among other things.
Informed by on-the-ground investigations and interviews in North and South Kivu, the report reveals that despite being on opposing sides, the national Congolese army and rebel groups, in particular the FDLR, regularly cooperate with each other, carving up territory and occasionally sharing the spoils of illegal mining. It warns that the recent integration of another armed group, the CNDP, into the national army will make it easier for the former rebels to get 'in on the act' of exploiting the mines.
Global Witness is calling for the following actions:
Companies trading in minerals from the DRC should carry out thorough due diligence to ensure that they are not funding warring parties;
The DRC and other governments should cut off warring parties' access to the mines and to international trade routes and external networks;
Home governments should hold to account their companies for involvement in the illicit mineral trade from DRC, including reporting them to the UN Security Council's sanctions committee.
Patrick Alley: "As long as the warring parties can fund themselves through international trade, they will continue to be able to inflict widespread violence on the population. Breaking the link between minerals and the violence must be an integral part of the solution - not something that is looked into once the peace is achieved."
For more information: In the UK: Amy Barry +44 (0)7980 664309, +44 (0)207 5616358, abarry@globalwitness.org In the DRC: Carina Tertsakian +243 (0) 81 422 6556 In the US: Corinna Gilfillan +1 202 725 8705, cgilfillan@globalwitness.org
Other materials, including full report, photos, first person testimonies and company fact sheet at www.globalwitness.org
Notes: Companies trading in minerals from the DRC in 2007 and 2008 included:
Belgium: Trademet, Traxys, SDE, STI and Speciality Metals;
Thailand: THAISARCO (owned by British company AMC);
UK: Afrimex, AMC;
Malaysia: Malaysian Smelting Corporation, Berhad;
China: African Ventures Ltd;
India: Met Trade India Ltd;
Russia: Eurosib logistics JSC.
For a fuller list and DRC export statistics, see the full report.
The desire to gain or maintain control of natural resources in eastern DRC has been a central factor in the armed conflict, estimated to have claimed several million lives since 1996. Much of the fighting in the east - the most severely affected region - has been centred on the control of rich mineral deposits. Mining areas have changed hands repeatedly in power struggles between the army and rebel groups and between constantly shifting alliances of army and rebel factions. Despite successive peace agreements, the violence continues in North and South Kivu to this day.
At the time of writing, the most significant rebel group operating in eastern DRC is the Forces démocratiques pour la libération du Rwanda (FDLR), a predominantly Rwandan Hutu armed group, some of whose leaders are alleged to have participated in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda. Despite a joint military operation by the Rwandan and Congolese armies against the FDLR in January 2009, the FDLR remains active, especially in South Kivu.
Until recently, the other main group was he CNDP - Congrès national pour la défense du people - a Tutsi led group backed by Rwanda, now integrated into the national army. Its de facto military leader is Bosco Ntaganda, wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court
End of Bulletin:
Source for this Message:
Global Witness
The dictator Kagame at UN
Dictators like Kagame who have changed their national constitutions to remain indefinitely on power should not be involved in UN high level and global activities including chairing UN meetings
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres
Kagame killed 200,000 Hutus from all regions of the country, the elderly and children who were left by their relatives, the disabled were burned alive. Other thousands of people were killed in several camps of displaced persons including Kibeho camp. All these war crimes remain unpunished.The British news reporters were accompanying Kagame’s fighters on day-by-day basis and witnessed these massacres, but they never reported on this.
25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.
The British irrational, extremist, partisan,biased, one-sided media and politicians have disregarded Kagame war crimes e.g. the Kibeho camp massacres, massacres of innocents Hutu refugees in DR. Congo. The British media have been supporting Kagame since he invaded Rwanda by organising the propaganda against the French over the Rwandan genocide, suppressing the truth about the genocide and promoting the impunity of Kagame and his cronies in the African Great Lakes Region. For the British, Rwanda does not need democracy, Rwanda is the African Israel; and Kagame and his guerilla fighters are heroes.The extremist British news reporters including Fergal Keane, Chris Simpson, Chris McGreal, Mark Doyle, etc. continue to hate the Hutus communities and to polarise the Rwandan society.
Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.
Kagame’s guerrilla war was aimed at accessing to power at any cost. He rejected all attempts and advice that could stop his military adventures including the cease-fire, political negotiations and cohabitation, and UN peacekeeping interventions. He ignored all warnings that could have helped him to manage the war without tragic consequences. Either you supported Kagame’ s wars and you are now his friend, or you were against his wars and you are his enemy. Therefore, Kagame as the Rwandan strong man now, you have to apologise to him for having been against his war and condemned his war crimes, or accept to be labelled as having been involved in the genocide. All key Kagame’s fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are the ones who hold key positions in Rwandan army and government for the last 15 years. They continue to be supported and advised by the British including Tony Blair, Andrew Mitchell MP, and the British army senior officials.
Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.
Genocide propaganda and fabrications are used by the so-called British scholars, news reporters and investigative journalists to promote their CVs and to get income out of the genocide through the selling of their books, providing testimonies against the French, access to consultancy contracts from the UN and Kagame, and participation in conferences and lectures in Rwanda, UK and internationally about genocide. Genocide propaganda has become a lucrative business for Kagame and the British. Anyone who condemned or did not support Kagame’s war is now in jail in Rwanda under the gacaca courts system suuported by British tax payer's money, or his/she is on arrest warrant if he/she managed to flee the Kagame’s regime. Others have fled the country and are still fleeing now. Many others Rwandans are being persecuted in their own country. Kagame is waiting indefinitely for the apologies from other players who warn him or who wanted to help to ensure that political negotiations take place between Kagame and the former government he was fighting against. Britain continues to supply foreign aid to Kagame and his cronies with media reports highlighting economic successes of Rwanda. Such reports are flawed and are aimed at misleading the British public to justify the use of British taxpayers’ money. Kagame and his cronies continue to milk British taxpayers’ money under the British budget support. This started from 1986 through the British budget support to Uganda until now.
Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.
No apologies yet to the Rwandan people. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway for Kagame to access power in Rwanda. The British media, politicians, and the so-called British scholars took the role of obstructing the search for the truth and justice; and of denying this assassination on behalf of General Kagame. General Paul Kagame has been obliging the whole world to apologise for his mistakes and war crimes. The UK’s way to apologise has been pumping massive aid into Rwanda's crony government and parliement; and supporting Kagame though media campaigns.
Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame
Kagame receives the British massive aid through the budget support, British excessive consultancy, sector wide programmes, the Tutsi-dominated parliament, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs; for political, economic and English language expansion to Rwanda. The British aid to Rwanda is not for all Rwandans. It is for Kagame himself and his Tutsi cronies.
Paul Kagame' actvities as former rebel
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.