The dictator Kagame at UN

The dictator Kagame at UN
Dictators like Kagame who have changed their national constitutions to remain indefinitely on power should not be involved in UN high level and global activities including chairing UN meetings

Why has the UN ignored its own report about the massacres of Hutu refugees in DRC ?

The UN has ignored its own reports, NGOs and media reports about the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Hutu in DRC Congo (estimated to be more than 400,000) by Kagame when he attacked Hutu refugee camps in Eastern DRC in 1996. This barbaric killings and human rights violations were perpetrated by Kagame’s RPF with the approval of UK and USA and with sympathetic understanding and knowledge of UNHCR and international NGOs which were operating in the refugees camps. According to the UN, NGO and media reports between 1993 and 2003 women and girls were raped. Men slaughtered. Refugees killed with machetes and sticks. The attacks of refugees also prevented humanitarian organisations to help many other refugees and were forced to die from cholera and other diseases. Other refugees who tried to return to Rwanda where killed on their way by RFI and did not reach their homes. No media, no UNHCR, no NGO were there to witness these massacres. When Kagame plans to kill, he makes sure no NGO and no media are prevent. Kagame always kills at night.

5 Jul 2014

Re: [RwandaLibre] Sommet des Grands Lacs: les FDLR ont six mois pour désarmer

 

Mr Nzinink,
 
Ceci répond-t-il à votre question d'il y a 2 jours?
 
Selon la Monusco, qui dit disposer d'une liste nominative, une dizaine de FDLR, civils comme militaires, sont recherchés par le Rwanda pour crimes de génocide. Parmi lesquels Sylvestre Mudacumura, l'un de leurs principaux chefs qui, lui, est aussi recherché par la CPI pour des crimes de guerre. Ceux-là sont exclus de tout processus de désarmement, selon la mission onusienne, et doivent être présentés devant la justice.


Le Vendredi 4 juillet 2014 16h51, "Nzinink nzinink@yahoo.com [RwandaLibre]" <RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com> a écrit :


 
 
Publié le 04-07-2014 Modifié le 04-07-2014 à 12:00

Sommet des Grands Lacs: les FDLR ont six mois pour désarmer

 
mediaLes rebelles FDLR ont un délai supplémentaire de six mois pour désarmer volontairement.Reuters
Les pays dans la région des Grands Lacs et de l'Afrique australe ont donc convenu, jeudi 3 juillet, de donner un délai supplémentaire aux FDLR pour qu'ils désarment volontairement. Ce moratoire pourrait empêcher toute intervention militaire, y compris onusienne, contre eux dans les six prochains mois. 
Selon le communiqué final des ministres de la CIRGL et de la SADC, la réunion ministérielle conjointe a « pris acte de la décision des FDLR de se rendre et de déposer les armes volontairement ». « La reddition et le désarmement volontaires doivent être effectués dans les six mois environ à compter du 2 juillet 2014, une évaluation vérifiable étant menée à mi-parcours », précise ce communiqué. Autre recommandation : « Exiger des FDLR d'effectuer leur reddition complète dans le délai fixé et les avertir des conséquences militaires qui découleront de leur non-respect du délai convenu ». La réunion ministérielle appelle également à un renforcement du mécanisme créé pour l'évaluation et la mise en œuvre du processus de désarmement et de rapatriement vers le Rwanda. Aucune autre solution n'est envisagée, notamment pas l'option évoquée par la Monusco et le gouvernement congolais d'un autre pays d'accueil pour ceux qui ne souhaiteraient pas rentrer chez eux.
 
Ce communiqué a été arraché après de longues heures de discussions, mercredi à Luanda. Une véritable bataille rangée, selon l'un des participants, autour de la question du délai accordé aux FDLR. Certains pays comme le Rwanda et l'Angola souhaitaient un délai beaucoup plus court. La durée de trois mois a été évoquée. Finalement, c'est un moratoire de six mois avec une évaluation à mi-parcours « vérifiable » qui a été retenu, comme le souhaitaient surtout les délégations congolaises, sud-africaines et tanzaniennes. « Le terme vérifiable est très vague et on parle d'environ six mois », regrette un observateur étranger.
 
Qui sont les FDLR ?
 
Les FDLR sont divisés en trois groupes armés. Il y a les Foca, la branche armée majoritaire. En 2008 et 2010, elle a connu deux dissidences  :  les FDLR Rud et Soki.
 
Ce sont les Foca qui ont annoncé leur intention de déposer les armes. Ce groupe est militairement structuré. La troupe est constituée de jeunes Rwandais, qui étaient pour l'essentiel enfants lors du génocide ou nés après 1994, mais aussi de jeunes Congolais. Les officiers, eux, sont tous rwandais et pour la très grande majorité des ex-FAR, l'armée rwandaise d'avant 1994. Selon la Monusco, qui dit disposer d'une liste nominative, une dizaine de FDLR, civils comme militaires, sont recherchés par le Rwanda pour crimes de génocide. Parmi lesquels Sylvestre Mudacumura, l'un de leurs principaux chefs qui, lui, est aussi recherché par la CPI pour des crimes de guerre. Ceux-là sont exclus de tout processus de désarmement, selon la mission onusienne, et doivent être présentés devant la justice.
 
Les officiers FDLR vivent ensemble depuis vingt ans dans les forêts du Congo. Ils y ont développé d'importantes activités commerciales, minières notamment. Leur mission, expliquent-ils, est de protéger les dizaines de milliers de réfugiés rwandais vivant dans l'est du Congo des attaques de Kigali, après notamment les massacres de1996 et 1997. Ces réfugiés qui vivent sous leur coupe servent, selon plusieurs sources militaires, de boucliers humains et leur donnent un poids politique.
 
Car ces FDLR-Foca ont aussi une branche politique qui s'est alliée depuis janvier à d'autres partis et notamment celui de l'ancien Premier ministre rwandais Faustin Twagiramungu. Cette aile politique entend obtenir un dialogue avec le gouvernement rwandais, ce que ce dernier refuse. Pour la première fois, la semaine dernière, une délégation de FDLR avait rencontré les envoyés spéciaux de la communauté internationale pour les Grands Lacs sous l'égide de Sant'Egidio. Cette réunion avait provoqué l'ire de Kigali qui accuse certains responsables d'avoir des velléités de « blanchir » les génocidaires. Le président Kagame s'est dit « dégouté » par le traitement réservé aux FDLR.
 
Le désarmement en questions
 
Sur les dix dernières années, selon l'ONU, 11 000 FDLR ont déjà déposé les armes. Les estimations du nombre de combattants encore actifs aujourd'hui varient d'une source à l'autre. Ils sont plus de 3 600 pour Kigali. 1 800 pour les estimations les plus basses. Depuis l'annonce en décembre dernier de leur intention de déposer les armes, un peu moins de 200 combattants FDLR et quelque 400 membres de famille se sont rendus dans les centres de démobilisation dans l'est de la RDC.
 
Il existe aujourd'hui deux camps qui accueillent les premiers FDLR démobilisés dans le cadre de ce nouveau processus, l'un au Nord-Kivu à Kanyabayonga et l'autre au Sud-Kivu à Walungu. Ce sont de simples camps de transit dans lesquels les quelques 180 combattants et leurs familles sont sommairement installés depuis un bon mois déjà. Ces camps sont quasi-saturés. Or, au Sud-Kivu, une cinquantaine de combattants FDLR attendent leur tour.
 
Or, ces 600 premiers Rwandais n'ont pas vocation à rester là. S'ils le souhaitent, ils devraient pouvoir rentrer au Rwanda. Les autres devraient être envoyés à l'ouest, loin des Kivu. D'abord à Kisangani puis en Equateur, à la base navale Irebu, le long du fleuve Congo. Mais là-bas, logistiquement, rien n'est encore prêt. Que va-t-il se passer en cas d'afflux dans les prochaines semaines ou prochains mois ?
Autre point inquiétant, selon plusieurs sources onusiennes, y compris le groupe d'experts des Nations unies, même s'ils affirment qu'ils ont déposé les armes, les FDLR continuent de recruter et de s'entraîner. Alors comment présumer de leur bonne foi ? Sur quels critères sera faite l'évaluation de mi-parcours prévue par la CIRGL et la SADC qui doit avoir lieu dans les trois mois ? Et comment va réagir la Monusco dont le mandat est de neutraliser ce groupe armé ? Politiquement, comme militairement, ce communiqué pourrait empêcher toute intervention militaire onusienne dans les six prochains mois. Notamment parce que la brigade d'intervention de l'ONU est composée de militaires issus des pays de la SADC. Or, le patron de la mission, Martin Kobler, avait fait de la « question FDLR » sa priorité pour 2014.

Sur le même sujet



__._,_.___

Posted by: Emmanuel Gasinzigwa <egasinzigwa@yahoo.fr>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

The principal key root causes that lead to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 that affected all Rwandan ethnic groups were:

1)The majority Hutu community’s fear of the return of the discriminatory monarchy system that was practiced by the minority Tutsi community against the enslaved majority Hutu community for about 500 years

2)The Hutu community’s fear of Kagame’s guerrilla that committed massacres in the North of the country and other parts of the countries including assassinations of Rwandan politicians.

3) The Rwandan people felt abandoned by the international community ( who was believed to support Kagame’s guerrilla) and then decided to defend themselves with whatever means they had against the advance of Kagame’ guerrilla supported by Ugandan, Tanzanian and Ethiopian armies and other Western powers.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions.

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions. Among Kagame’s rebels who were fighting against the Rwandan government, there were foreigners, mainly Ugandan fighters who were hired to kill and rape innocent Rwandan people in Rwanda and refugees in DRC.

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

SUMMARY : THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE BRITISH BUDGET SUPPORT AND GEO-STRATEGIC AMBITIONS

United Kingdom's Proxy Wars in Africa: The Case of Rwanda and DR Congo:

The Rwandan genocide and 6,000,000 Congolese and Hutu refugees killed are the culminating point of a long UK’s battle to expand their influence to the African Great Lakes Region. UK supported Kagame’s guerrilla war by providing military support and money. The UK refused to intervene in Rwanda during the genocide to allow Kagame to take power by military means that triggered the genocide. Kagame’s fighters and their families were on the Ugandan payroll paid by UK budget support.


· 4 Heads of State assassinated in the francophone African Great Lakes Region.
· 2,000,000 people died in Hutu and Tutsi genocides in Rwanda, Burundi and RD.Congo.
· 600,000 Hutu refugees killed in R.D.Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Rep of Congo.
· 6,000,000 Congolese dead.
· 8,000,000 internal displaced people in Rwanda, Burundi and DR. Congo.
· 500,000 permanent Rwandan and Burundian Hutu refugees, and Congolese refugees around the world.
· English language expansion to Rwanda to replace the French language.
· 20,000 Kagame’s fighters paid salaries from the British Budget Support from 1986 to present.
· £500,000 of British taxpayer’s money paid, so far, to Kagame and his cronies through the budget support, SWAPs, Tutsi-dominated parliament, consultancy, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs.
· Kagame has paid back the British aid received to invade Rwanda and to strengthen his political power by joining the East African Community together with Burundi, joining the Commonwealth, imposing the English Language to Rwandans to replace the French language; helping the British to establish businesses and to access to jobs in Rwanda, and to exploit minerals in D.R.Congo.



Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres

Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres
Kagame killed 200,000 Hutus from all regions of the country, the elderly and children who were left by their relatives, the disabled were burned alive. Other thousands of people were killed in several camps of displaced persons including Kibeho camp. All these war crimes remain unpunished.The British news reporters were accompanying Kagame’s fighters on day-by-day basis and witnessed these massacres, but they never reported on this.

Jobs

Download Documents from Amnesty International

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.

25,000  Hutu bodies  floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.
The British irrational, extremist, partisan,biased, one-sided media and politicians have disregarded Kagame war crimes e.g. the Kibeho camp massacres, massacres of innocents Hutu refugees in DR. Congo. The British media have been supporting Kagame since he invaded Rwanda by organising the propaganda against the French over the Rwandan genocide, suppressing the truth about the genocide and promoting the impunity of Kagame and his cronies in the African Great Lakes Region. For the British, Rwanda does not need democracy, Rwanda is the African Israel; and Kagame and his guerilla fighters are heroes.The extremist British news reporters including Fergal Keane, Chris Simpson, Chris McGreal, Mark Doyle, etc. continue to hate the Hutus communities and to polarise the Rwandan society.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.

Kagame  political  ambitions triggered the genocide.
Kagame’s guerrilla war was aimed at accessing to power at any cost. He rejected all attempts and advice that could stop his military adventures including the cease-fire, political negotiations and cohabitation, and UN peacekeeping interventions. He ignored all warnings that could have helped him to manage the war without tragic consequences. Either you supported Kagame’ s wars and you are now his friend, or you were against his wars and you are his enemy. Therefore, Kagame as the Rwandan strong man now, you have to apologise to him for having been against his war and condemned his war crimes, or accept to be labelled as having been involved in the genocide. All key Kagame’s fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are the ones who hold key positions in Rwandan army and government for the last 15 years. They continue to be supported and advised by the British including Tony Blair, Andrew Mitchell MP, and the British army senior officials.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support  financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.
Genocide propaganda and fabrications are used by the so-called British scholars, news reporters and investigative journalists to promote their CVs and to get income out of the genocide through the selling of their books, providing testimonies against the French, access to consultancy contracts from the UN and Kagame, and participation in conferences and lectures in Rwanda, UK and internationally about genocide. Genocide propaganda has become a lucrative business for Kagame and the British. Anyone who condemned or did not support Kagame’s war is now in jail in Rwanda under the gacaca courts system suuported by British tax payer's money, or his/she is on arrest warrant if he/she managed to flee the Kagame’s regime. Others have fled the country and are still fleeing now. Many others Rwandans are being persecuted in their own country. Kagame is waiting indefinitely for the apologies from other players who warn him or who wanted to help to ensure that political negotiations take place between Kagame and the former government he was fighting against. Britain continues to supply foreign aid to Kagame and his cronies with media reports highlighting economic successes of Rwanda. Such reports are flawed and are aimed at misleading the British public to justify the use of British taxpayers’ money. Kagame and his cronies continue to milk British taxpayers’ money under the British budget support. This started from 1986 through the British budget support to Uganda until now.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the  Rwandan genocide.
No apologies yet to the Rwandan people. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway for Kagame to access power in Rwanda. The British media, politicians, and the so-called British scholars took the role of obstructing the search for the truth and justice; and of denying this assassination on behalf of General Kagame. General Paul Kagame has been obliging the whole world to apologise for his mistakes and war crimes. The UK’s way to apologise has been pumping massive aid into Rwanda's crony government and parliement; and supporting Kagame though media campaigns.

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame
Kagame receives the British massive aid through the budget support, British excessive consultancy, sector wide programmes, the Tutsi-dominated parliament, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs; for political, economic and English language expansion to Rwanda. The British aid to Rwanda is not for all Rwandans. It is for Kagame himself and his Tutsi cronies.

Paul Kagame' actvities as former rebel

Africa

UN News Centre - Africa

The Africa Report - Latest

IRIN - Great Lakes

This blog reports the crimes that remain unpunished and the impunity that has generated a continuous cycle of massacres in many parts of Africa. In many cases, the perpetrators of the crimes seem to have acted in the knowledge that they would not be held to account for their actions.

The need to fight this impunity has become even clearer with the massacres and genocide in many parts of Africa and beyond.

The blog also addresses issues such as Rwanda War Crimes, Rwandan Refugee massacres in Dr Congo, genocide, African leaders’ war crimes and crimes against humanity, Africa war criminals, Africa crimes against humanity, Africa Justice.

-The British relentless and long running battle to become the sole player and gain new grounds of influence in the francophone African Great Lakes Region has led to the expulsion of other traditional players from the region, or strained diplomatic relations between the countries of the region and their traditional friends. These new tensions are even encouraged by the British using a variety of political and economic manoeuvres.

-General Kagame has been echoing the British advice that Rwanda does not need any loan or aid from Rwandan traditional development partners, meaning that British aid is enough to solve all Rwandan problems.

-The British obsession for the English Language expansion has become a tyranny that has led to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, dictatorial regimes, human rights violations, mass killings, destruction of families, communities and cultures, permanent refugees and displaced persons in the African Great Lakes region.


- Rwanda, a country that is run by a corrupt clique of minority-tutsi is governed with institutional discrmination, human rights violations, dictatorship, authoritarianism and autocracy, as everybody would expect.