The dictator Kagame at UN

The dictator Kagame at UN
Dictators like Kagame who have changed their national constitutions to remain indefinitely on power should not be involved in UN high level and global activities including chairing UN meetings

Why has the UN ignored its own report about the massacres of Hutu refugees in DRC ?

The UN has ignored its own reports, NGOs and media reports about the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Hutu in DRC Congo (estimated to be more than 400,000) by Kagame when he attacked Hutu refugee camps in Eastern DRC in 1996. This barbaric killings and human rights violations were perpetrated by Kagame’s RPF with the approval of UK and USA and with sympathetic understanding and knowledge of UNHCR and international NGOs which were operating in the refugees camps. According to the UN, NGO and media reports between 1993 and 2003 women and girls were raped. Men slaughtered. Refugees killed with machetes and sticks. The attacks of refugees also prevented humanitarian organisations to help many other refugees and were forced to die from cholera and other diseases. Other refugees who tried to return to Rwanda where killed on their way by RFI and did not reach their homes. No media, no UNHCR, no NGO were there to witness these massacres. When Kagame plans to kill, he makes sure no NGO and no media are prevent. Kagame always kills at night.

3 Nov 2012

Africa Great Lakes Region: Destabilization and Disintegration

http://nointervention.com/docs/war/disintegration.pdf

NoIntervention Doc: Destabilization and Disintegration
- 1 -
Destabilization and Disintegration

There is much talk about an obligation to intervene to stop genocide, and Rwanda
is the example most often cited. Specificly, the Darfur propaganda campaign against
Sudan makes use of the term genocide to construct justification for foreign intervention
to advance the wicked schemes of division and recolonization of Sudan. The term
genocide is so arbitrarily applied theses days that it became more a political instead
of a descriptive term. With regards to the Rwandan genocide, there is a massive
propaganda effort going on to rewrite history and hide the simple fact that it was
Western (US, British, France, Belgium and Germany) and UN/NGO intervention, and
not the lack of it, which helped provoke the Rwandan war and further escalation into
genocide.
Whatever story is being told always depends on the position of the one who tells it.
But no one can honestly deny that without foreign intervention in the form of financial
and military aid, as well as political and propaganda manipulation of the conflict, the
Rwandan war and genocide would not have developed the way it did. Talking about
'what would have happened if' is always speculative, but more likely than not, without
war-promoting policies of foreign Great Powers and the UN/OAU 'peace process', the
genocide would not have happened.
It is also important to note, that many more people than in the Rwandan genocide
itself died as a consequence of war in the DRCongo, which is related to the Rwandan
genocide through refugees, and sparked by the invasion of Rwandan and Ugandan
forces into the Congo. The enormous wealth of the Congo makes it a prime target
of expansionist interests and efforts of recolonization. And we should not forget to
mention, that the conflict of Rwanda was also spread into neighboring Burundi.
The following short summary is written from an anti-interventionist perspective arguing
against any foreign and 'international community' intervention. Any moral or legal
construct of an obligation to intervene into the affairs of other peoples can best be
understood as an effort to justify and legitimize more aggression and plunder.
In many ways, the colonial rule and post-colonial arrangements are the roots from
which division and conflict are nurtured and grow. The failure of African liberation
struggles to dissolve the political-economic structures and institutions imposed on them
by their colonial masters meant that the colonial legacies and dependencies continued
to weight heavily on their post-colonial histories.
Uganda a Proxy to Spread Violence
After the National Resistance Movement/Army (NRM/A), led by Yoweri Museveni,
seized power in Uganda January 1986, Uganda became the central component of
British and American foreign policy in the region. This policy aims at deliberate
destabilization and disintegration of states through the spreading of warlord politics
and ethnic strife. The strategy aims to weaken and make African states fail in order
to again put them under more direct foreign control. There are three regions which
became primarily targeted: the Great Lakes region and Congo, the Greater Horn of
Africa region, and the West Africa region.
Since 1986 Ugandan troops have been constantly engaged
in offensive military actions that include invasions of
neighbouring states and war crimes. Uganda has been involved
NoIntervention Doc: Destabilization and Disintegration
- 2 -
in aggressive military and political manipulation of ALL of
the states that share frontiers with Uganda.
The policies of Museveni have precipitated the worst violence
in Africa's history and jeopardised the lives of several dozen
millions of Africans who face hunger, disease and violent deaths
as a consequence. [1]
The NRA [National Resistance Army] was constituted mainly by
soldiers from Museveni's home area of Ankole in south-western
Uganda, but was supported by ethnic Tutsi soldiers from Rwanda.
The Rwandan connection emerged from the close ethnic ties
between the two groups along the Rwanda/Uganda border, and also
from the fact that Museveni had developed a strong friendship
with Paul Kagame, a Rwandan Tutsi, while the two had been
resident in Dar es Salaam. ... [2]
War against Rwanda
After the Rwandese had helped the NRM to take over power in Uganda, it was now
time to help them do the same in Rwanda. President Museveni and Kagame, supported
by and acting as proxy of the Americans and British, began to build up and prepare
the Rwandan Patriotic Front/Army (RPF/A) for war against Rwanda. The RPF recruited
its troops from the community of exiled Rwandan Tutsis, mostly second generation
refugees living in exile after their families had fled from Rwanda to escape persecution.
Rwandans serving in the Ugandan military received training
from British forces at their base in Jinja, Uganda, while the
Americans began schooling the RPF leadership. RPF leader, and
current president of Rwanda Paul Kagame, had previously been
Museveni's director of military intelligence. He had received
training in a Command and Staff course at Fort Leavenworth,
Kansas, just prior to his forces' invasion of Rwanda. ... [3]
By mid-1990, Uganda was preparing the invasion of Rwanda and on October 1, 1990
the RPF, supported by Ugandan troops, began the war, claiming that it was about the
right of exiled Rwandan Tutsis to return home, and to ensure that persecution of Tutsis
in Rwanda would end. Unlike many national liberation armies, the RPF strategy was
not designed to win any support of the people in 'liberated areas'. Instead, whole areas
were depopulated and people displaced in masses with each new RPF offensive.
The Habyarimana government in Rwanda, supported by France and initially Belgium,
which switched sides during the war, was militarily on the defensive, tried to regain
initiative with a program of political liberalisation, "which resulted in a
democratic constitution being written into law in June 1991.
Rwanda now had a multi-party system with scheduled elections.
All exiled Rwandans had the right of return." [4] The RPF, counting
on their ability to take over Rwanda militarily and advantage in the area of propaganda
to win the 'international community' opinion, refused to even test the offer to return and
participate in a political process. Participating would have made them just a political
grouping among others, and so they preferred to continue unabated with their quest to
seize power in Rwanda by military means.
NoIntervention Doc: Destabilization and Disintegration
- 3 -
HRW and other NGOs put out human rights reports to mobilize 'international
community' opinion against the Rwandan government and provide justification for the
RPF to continue the war. The international donor nations, threatening to cut off aid
monies, pressured the Rwandan goverment into the 'peace process' conducted under
the auspices of the OAU. President Habyarimana was forced to sign the Arusha Peace
Agreement on 3 August 1993, which effectively initiated the count-down to the genocide
April-July 1994 and ended with the seizing of power in Rwanda by the RPF.
Today, many blame insufficient troop strength of the UNAMIR 'peace-keeping'
operation for the failure of the 'Peace Agreement'. But this idea is based on the false
assumption that the involved DTS on both sides were interested in peace, or maybe
that they care enough about deaths of Rwandans. UN troops are never impartial but
mercenaries representing the interests of the DTS, which in the case of Rwanda were
devided among themselves. The RPF was out to seize complete control and the Hutu
extremists were not willing to accept that.
Into the Congo
The UN and humanitarian NGOs continued to contribute to destablization of the region
by helping to provide safe havens in the Congo for over a million refugees from
Rwanda, among them numerous of the killers of the Rwandan genocide, politicians
and organizers, like members of the defeated Rwandan army and Interahamwe. The
refugees were held up from returning to Rwanda by both the militia controlling the
camps and fear of massacre by the RPF. Killing of Tutsis continued in the refugees
camps and thousands died from a cholera epidemic. These 'refugees with big guns'
were repeatedly used by Rwanda as legitimization to invade the neighbor country.
The RPF, after taking power in Rwanda, did not focus on defending themselves against
attacks from militia in the Congo. Instead they moved on to expand into the Congo,
allying themselves with the Banyamulenge peoples in the Congo and began to provide
them with arms and training.
The history of these Banyamulenges starts in the late 20's,
Belgian colonial authority imported labor Rwandan into the
plantation of Kivu and the mines in Katanga. The purposes were:
I) high demographic rates in the high plan of Rwanda, which was
overpopulated, and II) to have easy controlled labor because
expatiated. This new group was composed hutus as well as tutsis.
With the other Rwanda population who were immigrates here
before colonial era, the rwandophones became a important ethnic
composition of this region. Earlier before the independence,
all of the rwandophones know now as Banyamulenges received the
Congolese nationality. [5]
Making a Weak State Fail
During the Cold War, President Mobutu of Zaire was a valued ally of the US and as
such enjoyed privileged treatment from western donors and the IMF/WB and Paris
Club alike. His alliance with the UNITA rebels in Angola provided him with another
important patronage resource. All this changed with the end of the Cold War. The
Troika of former backers (United States, Belgium, France) reversed their support and
instead began to put pressure on Mobutu. The WB broke its ties and the IMF announced
that Zaire would receive no more loans. Relations to donor governments and creditors
NoIntervention Doc: Destabilization and Disintegration
- 4 -
deteriorated, foreign firms left the country, banking services and the formal economic
activity collapsed.
Most Zairians faced the harsh consequences of an economy that
had shrunk 40 percent between 1988 and 1995 and of inflation
that had risen to 23,000 percent in 1995. [6]
Mobutu, faced with shrinking revenues to control his patron-client network and reward
associates for their loyalty, cut social services and public infrastructure expenditures,
effectively privatizing government revenues for himself. The radical privatization of the
state meant that those government functions and agencies not generating any benefit
in terms of control over resources and profit were abandoned.
Mobutu, who exercised private control over many of Zaire's
resources with foreign help, safely abandoned expensive health
care facilities, schools and public works - all of which served
citizens but contributed little to his stock of political
resources. [7]
Mobutu's long-run problem lay in reasserting his political
authority amid declining resources. His patronage network
fragmented as he lost his capacity to match the old rate of
payouts. Much of the (unpaid) army had disappeared by the early
1990s, for example, declining from a peak of 70,000 troops in
the mid-1980s to close to 20,000. Mobutu's first step was to
give new roles to specialized security forces. He gave six
distinct military units substantial new latitude of action to
profit from clandestine trade. ... Each unit jealously watched
the other while struggling to control its own wealth. [8]
The strategy aimed to encourage violence and ethnic strife to create a climate of
distrust and fear, disorganize and prevent any opposition groups from building political
authority, and encourage those no longer useful to warlord politics to give up. This
was cheap enough to finance and kept Mobutu in power as long as he could balance
contending forces. As part of this strategy, Mobutu supported the Hutu militia in the
refugee camps along the border with Rwanda.
... Even the Kinshasa government joined the looting in
1996, supporting a decree that stripped Zairian citizenship
from people of Rwandan-Tutsi ancestry [the above mentioned
Banyamulenges] and directed them to give up their property. ...
[9]
Rwandan Troops Invade
In October 1996, Rwandan troops entered Zaire in a vast military operation of
"cleaning", and further in support of the Banyamulenges, which they had provided
training and arms since taking power in Rwanda, as part of an armed coalition named
Alliance des Forces Democratiques pour la Liberation du Congo-Zaire (AFDL) led by
Laurent-Desire Kabila to overthrow Mobutu Sese Seko.
In September 1997, the prestigious Jane's Foreign Report
reported that German intelligence sources were aware that the
DIA trained young men and teens from Rwanda, Uganda, and eastern
Zaire for periods of up to two years and longer for the RPF/
NoIntervention Doc: Destabilization and Disintegration
- 5 -
AFDL-CZ campaign against Mobutu. The recruits were offered pay
of between $450 and $1000 upon their successful capture of
Kinshasa.[17]
Toward the end of 1996, US spy satellites were attempting to
ascertain how many refugees escaped into the jungle by locating
fires at night and canvas tarpaulins during the day. Strangely,
every time an encampment was discovered by the space-based
imagery, Rwandan and Zaire rebel forces attacked the sites.
This was the case in late February 1997, when 160,000, mainly
Hutu refugees, were spotted and then attacked in a swampy
area known as Tingi Tingi.[18] There was never an adequate
accounting by the Pentagon and US intelligence agencies of the
scope of intelligence provided to the RPF/AFDL-CZ.
...
When the AFDL-CZ and their Rwandan allies reached Kinshasa in
1996, it was largely due to the help of the United States.
One reason why Kabila's men advanced into the city so quickly
was the technical assistance provided by the DIA and other
intelligence agencies. According to informed sources in Paris,
US Special Forces actually accompanied ADFL-CZ forces into
Kinshasa. The Americans also reportedly provided Kabila's
rebels and Rwandan troops with high definition spy satellite
photographs that permitted them to order their troops to plot
courses into Kinshasa that avoided encounters with Mobutu's
forces.[20] During the rebel advance toward Kinshasa, Bechtel
provided Kabila, at no cost, high technology intelligence,
including National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
satellite data.[21] [10]
In May 1997, they took over Kinshasa and Kabila declared himself President of the
now renamed Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). After Kabila had ordered his
former Rwandan allies to withdraw from the DRC, Rwanda and Uganda again invaded
the DRCongo in August 1998, which prompted SADC to rush to the defense of their
member state (troops from Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia).
I don't know much about all the different warlords and rebel groups supported by whom
or masquerading as others and fighting on which side or independently and who did
what in the war which officially ended in April 2003. But very clear is, that the UN
and its agencies are now all over the DRCongo and in particular its Northeastern
part, which is possibly the richest part of the country both in terms of mineral and
agricultural resources, with officially more than 10,000 UN troops currently deployed.
The DRCongo, one of the most important exporters of strategic minerals worldwide, is
being put under International Community Control and Occupation.
References:
[1] "Violent Policy of Geopolitical Destabilization, Yoweri Museveni: Opportunist and
Military Hawk", africafront.com, Nov 2001, http://www.africanfront.com/uganda.php,
http://nointervention.com/archive/Africa/Uganda/uganda_Museveni.htm
[2] "Uganda: History of the conflict", idpproject.org,
Dec 2004, http://nointervention.com/archive/Africa/
Uganda/5982BABC8FEAFA22C1256F9E00455E86.htm
[3] "Rewriting Rwanda", Barrie Collins, 4/7/2004, http://nointervention.com/archive/
Africa/Rwanda/0000000CA4BD.htm
[4] "Rewriting Rwanda", Barrie Collins, 4/7/2004, http://nointervention.com/archive/
Africa/Rwanda/0000000CA4BD.htm
[5] "The fall of Mobutu", Wu Wei, 1999, http://www.empereur.com/nations/congo/
The fall of Mobutu.htm, http://nointervention.com/archive/Africa/DRCongo/
The_fall_of_Mobutu.html
[6] Warlord politics and African states /William Reno. ,1555876730 (alk. paper), page
154
[7] Warlord politics and African states /William Reno. ,1555876730 (alk. paper), page
152/53
[8] Warlord politics and African states /William Reno. ,1555876730 (alk. paper), page
159
[9] Warlord politics and African states /William Reno. ,1555876730 (alk. paper), page
161
[10] ""Genocide and Covert Operations in Africa 1993-1999", Prepared Testimony
and Statement of Wayne Madsen, Author", 5/17/2001, http://nointervention.com/
archive/Africa/other/MAD111A.html
Abbrevations:









From: Samuel Desire <sam4des@yahoo.com>
T
Subject: [AFRICAFORUM] Uganda to withdraw troops from Somalia, says Mukasa

 
Museveni of Uganda is  well known to tell lies about his destabilization of the African Great Lakes Region. He is a liar, a cheater. No one can trust him. He supported the Kagame's war from 1990-1994 which triggered the Rwandan genocide. He was always denying Uganda's support to Kagame's war. So, Uganda should leave Somalia immediately and stop their support to M23 and other fake regional meetings.
 
Uganda to withdraw troops from Somalia, says Mukasa
 
Uganda will withdraw its forces from UN-backed international missions, Security Minister Muruli Mukasa says, escalating a long-running row.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-20187369
 
 
__._,_.___
Activités récentes:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=--=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Africa Forum est un forum Internet libre, neutre, objectif et non partisan; qui favorise, dans un cadre international et multiculturel et dans une perspective solidaire et amicale  la diffusion et l'échange d'informations et d'idées  sur les questions touchant le développement politique, socio-économique, culturel, moral  et humain  du peuple africain.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=
Seuls les messages diffuses en Français sont acceptes dans ce groupe. Les messages en langues/dialectes locales ne sont pas permis. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pour plus d'info :

http://forumpanafricain.blogspot.co.uk/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Envoyer un message :
Africaforum@yahoogroupes.fr
S'inscrire :
Africaforum-subscribe@yahoogroupes.fr
Désinscription :
Africaforum-unsubscribe@yahoogroupes.fr
Fondateur de la liste :
Africaforum-owner@yahoogroupes.fr

------------------------

Powered by Africa Online media Group, London, UK

.

__,_._,___


at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

The principal key root causes that lead to the Rwandan genocide of 1994 that affected all Rwandan ethnic groups were:

1)The majority Hutu community’s fear of the return of the discriminatory monarchy system that was practiced by the minority Tutsi community against the enslaved majority Hutu community for about 500 years

2)The Hutu community’s fear of Kagame’s guerrilla that committed massacres in the North of the country and other parts of the countries including assassinations of Rwandan politicians.

3) The Rwandan people felt abandoned by the international community ( who was believed to support Kagame’s guerrilla) and then decided to defend themselves with whatever means they had against the advance of Kagame’ guerrilla supported by Ugandan, Tanzanian and Ethiopian armies and other Western powers.

-“The enemies of Freedom do not argue ; they shout and they shoot.”

-“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

-“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

-“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.”

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions.

The Rwanda war of 1990-1994 had multiple dimensions. Among Kagame’s rebels who were fighting against the Rwandan government, there were foreigners, mainly Ugandan fighters who were hired to kill and rape innocent Rwandan people in Rwanda and refugees in DRC.

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

SUMMARY : THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE BRITISH BUDGET SUPPORT AND GEO-STRATEGIC AMBITIONS

United Kingdom's Proxy Wars in Africa: The Case of Rwanda and DR Congo:

The Rwandan genocide and 6,000,000 Congolese and Hutu refugees killed are the culminating point of a long UK’s battle to expand their influence to the African Great Lakes Region. UK supported Kagame’s guerrilla war by providing military support and money. The UK refused to intervene in Rwanda during the genocide to allow Kagame to take power by military means that triggered the genocide. Kagame’s fighters and their families were on the Ugandan payroll paid by UK budget support.


· 4 Heads of State assassinated in the francophone African Great Lakes Region.
· 2,000,000 people died in Hutu and Tutsi genocides in Rwanda, Burundi and RD.Congo.
· 600,000 Hutu refugees killed in R.D.Congo, Uganda, Central African Republic and Rep of Congo.
· 6,000,000 Congolese dead.
· 8,000,000 internal displaced people in Rwanda, Burundi and DR. Congo.
· 500,000 permanent Rwandan and Burundian Hutu refugees, and Congolese refugees around the world.
· English language expansion to Rwanda to replace the French language.
· 20,000 Kagame’s fighters paid salaries from the British Budget Support from 1986 to present.
· £500,000 of British taxpayer’s money paid, so far, to Kagame and his cronies through the budget support, SWAPs, Tutsi-dominated parliament, consultancy, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs.
· Kagame has paid back the British aid received to invade Rwanda and to strengthen his political power by joining the East African Community together with Burundi, joining the Commonwealth, imposing the English Language to Rwandans to replace the French language; helping the British to establish businesses and to access to jobs in Rwanda, and to exploit minerals in D.R.Congo.


Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres

Thousands of Hutu murdered by Kagame inside Rwanda, e.g. Kibeho massacres
Kagame killed 200,000 Hutus from all regions of the country, the elderly and children who were left by their relatives, the disabled were burned alive. Other thousands of people were killed in several camps of displaced persons including Kibeho camp. All these war crimes remain unpunished.The British news reporters were accompanying Kagame’s fighters on day-by-day basis and witnessed these massacres, but they never reported on this.

Jobs

Loading...

Download Documents from Amnesty International

Loading...

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.

25,000 Hutu bodies floated down River Akagera into Lake Victoria in Uganda.
The British irrational, extremist, partisan,biased, one-sided media and politicians have disregarded Kagame war crimes e.g. the Kibeho camp massacres, massacres of innocents Hutu refugees in DR. Congo. The British media have been supporting Kagame since he invaded Rwanda by organising the propaganda against the French over the Rwandan genocide, suppressing the truth about the genocide and promoting the impunity of Kagame and his cronies in the African Great Lakes Region. For the British, Rwanda does not need democracy, Rwanda is the African Israel; and Kagame and his guerilla fighters are heroes.The extremist British news reporters including Fergal Keane, Chris Simpson, Chris McGreal, Mark Doyle, etc. continue to hate the Hutus communities and to polarise the Rwandan society.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.

Kagame political ambitions triggered the genocide.
Kagame’s guerrilla war was aimed at accessing to power at any cost. He rejected all attempts and advice that could stop his military adventures including the cease-fire, political negotiations and cohabitation, and UN peacekeeping interventions. He ignored all warnings that could have helped him to manage the war without tragic consequences. Either you supported Kagame’ s wars and you are now his friend, or you were against his wars and you are his enemy. Therefore, Kagame as the Rwandan strong man now, you have to apologise to him for having been against his war and condemned his war crimes, or accept to be labelled as having been involved in the genocide. All key Kagame’s fighters who committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are the ones who hold key positions in Rwandan army and government for the last 15 years. They continue to be supported and advised by the British including Tony Blair, Andrew Mitchell MP, and the British army senior officials.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.

Aid that kills: The British Budget Support financed Museveni and Kagame’s wars in Rwanda and DRC.
Genocide propaganda and fabrications are used by the so-called British scholars, news reporters and investigative journalists to promote their CVs and to get income out of the genocide through the selling of their books, providing testimonies against the French, access to consultancy contracts from the UN and Kagame, and participation in conferences and lectures in Rwanda, UK and internationally about genocide. Genocide propaganda has become a lucrative business for Kagame and the British. Anyone who condemned or did not support Kagame’s war is now in jail in Rwanda under the gacaca courts system suuported by British tax payer's money, or his/she is on arrest warrant if he/she managed to flee the Kagame’s regime. Others have fled the country and are still fleeing now. Many others Rwandans are being persecuted in their own country. Kagame is waiting indefinitely for the apologies from other players who warn him or who wanted to help to ensure that political negotiations take place between Kagame and the former government he was fighting against. Britain continues to supply foreign aid to Kagame and his cronies with media reports highlighting economic successes of Rwanda. Such reports are flawed and are aimed at misleading the British public to justify the use of British taxpayers’ money. Kagame and his cronies continue to milk British taxpayers’ money under the British budget support. This started from 1986 through the British budget support to Uganda until now.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.

Dictator Kagame: No remorse for his unwise actions and ambitions that led to the Rwandan genocide.
No apologies yet to the Rwandan people. The assassination of President Juvenal Habyarimana by Kagame was the only gateway for Kagame to access power in Rwanda. The British media, politicians, and the so-called British scholars took the role of obstructing the search for the truth and justice; and of denying this assassination on behalf of General Kagame. General Paul Kagame has been obliging the whole world to apologise for his mistakes and war crimes. The UK’s way to apologise has been pumping massive aid into Rwanda's crony government and parliement; and supporting Kagame though media campaigns.

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame

Fanatical, partisan, suspicious, childish and fawning relations between UK and Kagame
Kagame receives the British massive aid through the budget support, British excessive consultancy, sector wide programmes, the Tutsi-dominated parliament, British and Tutsi-owned NGOs; for political, economic and English language expansion to Rwanda. The British aid to Rwanda is not for all Rwandans. It is for Kagame himself and his Tutsi cronies.

Paul Kagame' actvities as former rebel

Africa

Loading...

UN News Centre - Africa

Loading...

The Africa Report - Latest

Loading...

IRIN - Great Lakes

Loading...

This blog reports the crimes that remain unpunished and the impunity that has generated a continuous cycle of massacres in many parts of Africa. In many cases, the perpetrators of the crimes seem to have acted in the knowledge that they would not be held to account for their actions.

The need to fight this impunity has become even clearer with the massacres and genocide in many parts of Africa and beyond.

The blog also addresses issues such as Rwanda War Crimes, Rwandan Refugee massacres in Dr Congo, genocide, African leaders’ war crimes and crimes against humanity, Africa war criminals, Africa crimes against humanity, Africa Justice.

-The British relentless and long running battle to become the sole player and gain new grounds of influence in the francophone African Great Lakes Region has led to the expulsion of other traditional players from the region, or strained diplomatic relations between the countries of the region and their traditional friends. These new tensions are even encouraged by the British using a variety of political and economic manoeuvres.

-General Kagame has been echoing the British advice that Rwanda does not need any loan or aid from Rwandan traditional development partners, meaning that British aid is enough to solve all Rwandan problems.

-The British obsession for the English Language expansion has become a tyranny that has led to genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, dictatorial regimes, human rights violations, mass killings, destruction of families, communities and cultures, permanent refugees and displaced persons in the African Great Lakes region.

- Rwanda, a country that is run by a corrupt clique of minority-tutsi is governed with institutional discrmination, human rights violations, dictatorship, authoritarianism and autocracy, as everybody would expect.